Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 04-08-2004, 01:39 AM
George Rice George Rice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 403
Default Re: Exact solution

That method won't provide you with the exact answer. Weighting, for example XYo as a 12, is inaccurate. You would need to consider whether the suits are contained in the opponent's hands.

Let's look at AA vs 76o. Your method sees 6*12 occurances of this, all at the same edge for the AA. But that isn't the case. You have 6*2 cases of AA over 76o where no suits are duplicated (the best odds for the 76o hand), 6*8 cases where one of the suits are duplicated (worse for 76o), and 6*2 cases where both suits are duplicated (worst of all for 76o).

Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 04-08-2004, 01:47 AM
karlson karlson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 233
Default Re: Exact solution

As I noted, I did the second sum explicitly for all 1225 hands. Some savings can be done, but they would be more complicated than the 4,6,12 weighting, as you correctly note. However, the first grouping is perfectly legit, as AhAd will have the exact same results as AsAc, in total (e.g. for the case when AhAd is against 7s6c, there is a corresponding case when AsAc is against 7h6d).
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 04-08-2004, 02:03 AM
George Rice George Rice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 403
Default Re: Exact solution

The way I'm looking at the problem now is that if the average win is 60%, to pick a number, I would solve for X as follows:

A(100(.60-.40)-X) = (B+C)*X

So X = 20A/(A+B+C)

Where:
A is the number of hands you have the advantage
B is the number of hands your opponent has the advantage
C is the number of hands neither has the advantage

Is this how you figured for X?

Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-08-2004, 02:16 AM
karlson karlson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 233
Default Re: Exact solution

Sure, looks fine. You may want to simplify to X = (A/(A+B+C))*(.6-.4)*100.

The part that you need the computer for is getting that average win figure.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 04-08-2004, 02:27 AM
George Rice George Rice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 403
Default This game has the makings of a casino game.

If this game was played against a casino where the casino showed its cards, X was the non-returnable "ante", and you had option of betting $100 or folding, then a game like this (or some variation) might actually be spread some day. Of course, X would be high enough to gurantee positve ev for the casino. You could even allow the player to win back the ante by just raising it's value (probably doubling "X"). Maybe pay a premium for quads and straight flushes, similar to Caribbean Stud. And you can bet up to "Y" times the ante.

Hmmmm. "Hawaiian Hold'em"
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 04-08-2004, 02:28 AM
George Rice George Rice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 403
Default Re: Exact solution

[ QUOTE ]
The part that you need the computer for is getting that average win figure.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you already did that.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 04-08-2004, 03:07 AM
karlson karlson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 233
Default Re: Exact solution

I did....and posted my answer.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 04-08-2004, 03:09 AM
karlson karlson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 233
Default Re: This game has the makings of a casino game.

Look, if hold'em challenge didn't make it, then this is doomed, as it's about 100 times more boring for the player.

BTW, David, what was the end result with hold'em challenge? It did get spread at some point, no?
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 04-08-2004, 08:28 AM
BugsBunny BugsBunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 537
Default Re: Let\'s Guess AT This One

Without looking at any possible answers I would guess 10-15 dollars. 50% of the time you have an edge and play. 50% of the time you fold. The max edge you can have is probably about 60% - but that's the extreme. Even assuming that that would bring x to about 30. If we assume the average edge is half of that that would be a 30% edge so x=15. I suspect the average edge is smaller than that so I'll say that x should be 10$.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 04-08-2004, 11:32 AM
Redsox Redsox is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 12
Default Re: Clarifying the question

Ok. So you call obviously 50 % of the time. I estimate when you call you win about 60% of the time. That means that in 100 chances, calling 50, you win 30, and lose 20. That makes for a profit of $1000 ($30*100-$20*100). If you pay on EVERY hand, regardless, you would have to pay $10 a hand to make it an even money bet. Correct?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.