Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-18-2005, 05:27 PM
Bodhi Bodhi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 425
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

[ QUOTE ]
why no river C/R?

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2005, 05:31 PM
Rev. Good Will Rev. Good Will is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: failing computer science
Posts: 591
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why no river C/R?

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

whoops, thought hero had 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]'s
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2005, 05:45 PM
Bodhi Bodhi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 425
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

Damn tricky spades! [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2005, 06:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

I agree, you appear to be WA/WB (I think he has AA-QQ or 2 overcards, possibly with an ultimately made flush draw), and check/calling to the river was the right play.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2005, 06:49 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

I would bet the river. I would hate to see him check behind with AK.

I would also call a raise because your bet looks like a pitiful bluff and he might raise to push you off your bluff (which is a stupid play, but aggro players do it anyway).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-19-2005, 12:14 AM
SlantNGo SlantNGo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 133
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

[ QUOTE ]
I would bet the river. I would hate to see him check behind with AK.

I would also call a raise because your bet looks like a pitiful bluff and he might raise to push you off your bluff (which is a stupid play, but aggro players do it anyway).

[/ QUOTE ]

You think I'm ahead of enough hands to profitably bet/call? I would bet if I could fold to a raise, or if I feel like my hand beats more than 50% of the range he'll raise on the river given the preflop 3-bet AND the flop raise (which I didn't).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-19-2005, 01:38 AM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: WA/WB vs. a TAG who probably thinks I\'m LAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would bet the river. I would hate to see him check behind with AK.

I would also call a raise because your bet looks like a pitiful bluff and he might raise to push you off your bluff (which is a stupid play, but aggro players do it anyway).

[/ QUOTE ]

You think I'm ahead of enough hands to profitably bet/call? I would bet if I could fold to a raise, or if I feel like my hand beats more than 50% of the range he'll raise on the river given the preflop 3-bet AND the flop raise (which I didn't).

[/ QUOTE ]

If you think TAG thinks you're a LAG, call the raise. Most TAGs are too AG against LAGs. However, I don't think you see a river raise very often.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.