|
|
#11
06-23-2005, 02:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I thought 1/2 was supposed to be a rock garden??
I'd call the turn and fold the river. Looks like trips on the river so I could get away from that hand if mp1 wasn't a wack job. Button looks like A3 or A5 spades (or offsuit)or something like KQ spades. . . maybe.
Utg looks like sevens. . . bets his overpair on the flop, bets the turn (8h) after the pot was capped on flop. I could see bad aggressive players make this play. Then just calls after being raised on turn? Maybe threes or fives as well. Then he leads on 5th? Weird Utg I'm guessin was limpin' with fours or twos pre flop. Hard to get somewhat accurate reads when you're at the zoo. Either way I think you're in bad shape when mp1 comes out of no where at the river. I'd say check 4th . . . fold 5th. 
|
|
#13
06-23-2005, 02:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought 1/2 was supposed to be a rock garden??
[ QUOTE ]
hooray for the button repping the name, though I woulda coldcapped, and taken it 10BB worth postflop because I really like 22 [/ QUOTE ] I'm glad I could entertain you. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
06-23-2005, 09:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought 1/2 was supposed to be a rock garden??
[ QUOTE ]
hooray for the button repping the name, though I woulda coldcapped, and taken it 10BB worth postflop because I really like 22 [/ QUOTE ] nice post [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
06-23-2005, 10:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I thought 1/2 was supposed to be a rock garden??
1/2 full has the rep of being tight-passive.
9-max has the rep of being much looser/aggressive than full, although nobody can figure out why with only 1 less player. That's just what I've read. KO
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
