Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-16-2005, 02:22 PM
esbesb esbesb is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

Sorry, I meant villian in the hand, not you.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-16-2005, 02:53 PM
Toonces Toonces is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 31
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

[ QUOTE ]
What's your plan if 3-4 players called your preflop raise and you completely wiffed?

[/ QUOTE ]

In the past? One stab at a continuation bet if the flop is uncoordinated, otw fold. Now, I believe you that I shouldn't raise... still converting from limit thinking in many regards.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-16-2005, 03:23 PM
Toonces Toonces is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 31
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

Results below:

<font color="white"> Esbesb is correct. Villian has KK. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-16-2005, 03:31 PM
granny50 granny50 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 14
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

AQs is not a bad hand to raise after 3 limpers, but once I get limp reraised, its time to let go of the hand. The only reason I would limp with AQs is if the limpers limp right along with suited cards. That way when I do hit the flush I bust them (but this is deep stacked poker). Once I get limp reraised its time to get rid of this hand, because I really can't think of a good flop for AQ in a limp reraised pot other than flopping a straight.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-16-2005, 03:35 PM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rochester, NH
Posts: 400
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

[ QUOTE ]
Results below:

<font color="white"> Esbesb is correct. Villian has KK. </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

That's all well and good. You're beat here the majority of the time. You have to call though.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-16-2005, 03:38 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: AQs vs. limp-reraise

Before reading any responses.....

Your raise PF is very debatable. With this many players in, out of position, in a game where you're going to get lots of callers..... I think AQ is too tough to play OOP. I would have just called.

After the limp-reraise.... you HAVE to fold this hand. You're not getting any action unless you're beat, unless you hit the flush or straight. What would CO limp-raise with? Admittedly, it's pretty fishy that he did it from the cutoff, but most players are in the AA-QQ range after this move. Unless you are very sure cutoff could do this with a much wider range than this, you have to fold this.

Since you called...

I think checking is fine on the flop, too likely that you get raised, and then you'll never have odds to catch your gutshot.

His checking behind screams KKK to me.

Turn, I don't really think that this was a good card for your hand, I would have checked it. I still put CO on KKK.

After you bet... you're fairly pot committed, but I think you're drawing to a T.

Fold PF. Check/Fold after that, unless you hit a T.

Since you bet the turn, you probably have to call, you're pot committed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.