Fresh off Entity's post...

[scotty34]

[ QUOTE ]
No, because BB was all in to call CO's raise - sorry about my conversion errors, but like I said in my original post one of the factors I used in calling was knowing I would be closing the action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah OK, I missed that part about him going all in. I still don't really like the call in terms of EV though. I just can't see top pair being good here. There is way too much action, and way too many hands that beat you.

[DavidC]

Nice hand, but you might want to raise the turn. BB calling your three-bet on the flop doesn't look too threatening, neither does the 2. If he's got two pair, he'll probably just call your raise, and you've got a chance to draw out.

You especially want to get cash from the CO, who looks to be drawing to a weaker flush (at least, he does on the turn).

It sucks that the BB is passive after 80 hands... it may therefore be correct to call the turn. However, this is something that I would probably raise.

--Dave.

Re: calling the river raise: It's probably pretty close, slightly negative or slightly positive, depending on your read of the opponent. Glad it worked out for you!

[atnels]

No, I lost to BB's baby flush. CO raised with KQo, so I was actually ahead of him. It's weird crap like that you see at Party that makes me hesitate to muck a hand like this one getting 10:1....