#21
|
|||
|
|||
How about me?
I played $10/$20 once. Fly me to your ranch/farm/etc., put me up in your best guest room, feed me well, and coach me for 2 weeks. Then, fly me to Las Vegas with a $100K of "your" money. Then, fly me home when I'm done.
Just look at my posts (you have to go to small stakes for that) and you will clearly see that I'm an up and commer! Ha ha, sorry, it's Sat. night and I'm stuck at home baby sitting computers. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How about me?
study and put in your time and the 100 g's may be yours after all. all it takes is to just do things right and dont stray. you can do it.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
Yeah, Coilean was rock-solid. And GD was a stud too.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How about me?
study and put in your time and the 100 g's may be yours after all. all it takes is to just do things right and dont stray. you can do it.
Thank you Mr. Zee. You are a good sport and always offer good advice. Hope I see you around. c ya, pf |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
Dynasty and Tommy, if their play is in any direct correlation to the quality of their posts ( and quatity with Dynasty. Always well thought out and interesting.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
Some of the 2+2 posters don't play as well as they sound on these posts!
I totally agree with you. It's much easy to think out a problem in a post then on the spot. Not to mention the advice some of them actually give in their posts. I almost lost my dinner when I read a few of those names Ray Z spit out. Most of them couldn't pull in $75,000-$100,000 a year if their life depended on it... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
I know who she is......she's on one of David Sklansky's videos....i think "the seminar"
It's funny....because I was thinking the same thing when I saw her name......she has long black hair....and wears glasses...... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
On a side note, I don't think you ever really want to bankroll someone for a live game unless he/she spent all their poker winnings helping a sick relative(or some other expense). Otherwise, most poker games are easy enough to beat in the long run to build your own bankroll.
That being said, most of the people on this forum probably would be good people to bankroll at the limits they already play. But there's probably little appeal to the player for that arrangement. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
creampuff,
yea, some of those wont become millionairs for a few years yet. if they got rich too fast they might quit the forum. btw you ned to change your eating habits. try more veggis and fruit. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: who would you bankroll?
skp,
Thanks for mentioning me. I don't have time to post as much as I used to and I miss it. I also wish I had constant internet access at work so I could take breaks now and then and get involved in ongoing threads with immediate responses and counter responses. I assume guys like you post while on the job instead of playing solitaire and so on. Taking an occasional break at work is necessary for productivity. On your list I agree with your choices and also miss Coilean. But there is a lot of new blood too that is exceptional. Any new 2+2 er's who want to check out the older archives should look up John Feeney, Dan Hanson and Louie Landale. All three are terrific. If they had a thread on which poster doesn't play as well as he writes, I'd be close to number one. I don't tilt but my concentration at the table is just terrible when I'm not in a hand. Regards, Rick |
|
|