Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Psychology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-19-2005, 05:35 PM
Zeno Zeno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Spitsbergen
Posts: 1,599
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, and let them be perhaps pedantic and possibly douchebags but let them NOT be misanthropic.


[/ QUOTE ]

If they were misanthropic, I submit they would not land and furthermore, if they had the power, would destroy the Earth. I suspect that's your point. And a very bad one to my way of thinking. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Le Misanthrope
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-19-2005, 05:55 PM
Zeno Zeno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Spitsbergen
Posts: 1,599
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

I'll interject some more fog into this thread. I did not read all the responses so I’m not really responding to something specific, just a general comment.

It is wiser, perhaps, to categorize yourself as a rationalist. (I made a post about this long ago in another "God/Atheist/Religion thread on this forum). The atheist label constrains the framework of the debate and pulls it into the field of theology and other metaphysical strictures and usual bogs the discussion down to 'GOD (RELIGON) Vs. ANTI-GOD (ANTI-RELIGION) Vs. IT IS ALL A MEANINGLESS QUESTION Vs VARIOUS DEGREES OF QUIBBLING'. Which is interesting, but limited, in my opinion. There are other and even more practical reasons for avoiding the atheist label.

-Zeno
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-19-2005, 06:01 PM
Mayhap Mayhap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Navigating the Noosphere
Posts: 228
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

This was an inside joke and not a serious statement. Not knowing that, I would have found it a bit strange and flawed as well. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

/M
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-20-2005, 02:29 AM
fluxrad fluxrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Peruvian highlands.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

[ QUOTE ]
What if aliens landed on earth tomorrow and they also turned out to be Christian (or the same as any other religion currently worshiped on earth).

How would you feel about that? Would it change your views? Of course this is only in theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

The answer to this question is mu.

There is not enough evidence to go either way. How did the Aliens arrive at their Christianity? Had they observed it here, thought it was a cool religion, and decided to convert?

You also mentioned that it could possibly be an "equivalent" religion. If you just mean that they believe in God, I fail to see how that could be considered compelling evidence that there was one. Sagan's explanation of the origins of religion would also account for the rise of religion in any other advanced species.

Now then, if they'd never been here before, but had a religion that specifically talked about a dude nameed Jesus on a planet called Earth that no one had ever been to but was foretold by some Alien prophet named @#%WFwgrwgrw@R#R...

Then I'd probably start going to church.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-20-2005, 09:46 AM
Belok Belok is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 150
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

If aliens came to earth...wouldnt the bible need to be rewritten to explain their existence?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-20-2005, 11:51 AM
Piers Piers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 246
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

[ QUOTE ]
What if aliens landed on earth tomorrow and they also turned out to be Christian (or the same as any other religion currently worshiped on earth).

How would you feel about that

[/ QUOTE ]

Extremely surprised.

[ QUOTE ]
Would it change your views?

[/ QUOTE ]

The first thing would be to analyse WHY the aliens are claiming they believe they are Christians.

From the current evidence I would say the most likely explanation is that they are lying.

Second most likely explanation is that they have been converted since making contact with humans.

Off hand can not think of any other likely explanations.

[ QUOTE ]
Of course this is only in theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guessed.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-20-2005, 06:10 PM
jmgurgeh jmgurgeh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

Let's assume that these aliens are telling the truth. They are NOT sitting in their ships monitoring our beliefs and coming up with the most hilarious scam in the universe. They are NOT trying to use us to their own ends. And they are COMPLETELY honest about everything. If so, I would have questions.

What flavor Christian are these aliens? Are they Catholics? Do they believe in birth control? Are they against premarital sex? Are they still against both given the rampant starvation and spread of AIDS? Do they actually love their enemies, or do they proclaim god's love while hording a vicious contempt for nonbelievers and wrongdoers? Do they have exactly the same ten commandments? Do they believe literally in the Bible? And if so, which Bible? Do they have two creation and two flood stories in theirs? Do they tend to be conservative like American Christians who think the poor are trying to milk welfare and destroy our values, or liberal like the rest of the world, who think that we should care for the poor and that they are not an evil mass bent on replacing "family values" with Satanism? Is there a real Hell that god sends you to if you're bad, or is hell just a state you choose to be in, away from god, which is more of a concept than a patriarchal superbeing? And when they translated the line about not being a sin to kill a witch, did they translate it as "witch" or "poisoner"?

I guess the reason I have a hard time even theoretically answering the question is because the term "Christian" just doesn't mean anything concrete. It could mean something I was getting at above, or nothing like that at all.

What if aliens came down and they were all Moonies? Now that's a scary idea.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-22-2005, 02:07 AM
jogumon jogumon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

[ QUOTE ]
That would be stong evidence that the religion is true

[/ QUOTE ]

No. It is strong evidence that the psychological need for religion is universal.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-22-2005, 02:45 AM
Little Fishy Little Fishy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MA, and NY for school
Posts: 8
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

agnostics are the group open to believing, athiests are the group that don't believe in anything but what they can touch, and then again not even that
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-22-2005, 01:35 PM
akudlac akudlac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: A question for aethists (and Sklansky)

[ QUOTE ]
agnostics are the group open to believing, athiests are the group that don't believe in anything but what they can touch, and then again not even that

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're going to troll, at least try and put some effort into it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.