Winrate change at party with deeper stacks? - Page 2

swolfe · #11 03-10-2005, 10:27 AM

this month i've been running about 14PTBB/100 at the $100, but only 3PTBB/100 at the $50...go figure...

Yeti · #12 03-10-2005, 10:40 AM

[ QUOTE ]
New games- Really tough to say, but I'm guessing 12-16bb/100. Time will tell.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm, doubt it. Maybe at the 25NL. 10 will remain something to strive for I think.

stigmata · #13 03-10-2005, 11:02 AM

Excuse the newbie Q. (i'm jus trying to learn this NL stuff):

What does the "PT" bit mean in the PT10BB/100?

Yeti · #14 03-10-2005, 11:41 AM

PT means PokerTracker, we're just using this to indicate we are talking about the figure quoted in PT.

PTBB's are double the size of the big blind.

jtr · #15 03-10-2005, 12:14 PM

Interesting to get your estimate and PFunk's estimate, Yeti. So my range of 12.5 -- 15 PTBB/100 as a cap for near-perfect play looks optimistic to you? Fair enough, you may very well be right. But didn't you always maintain that 10 was the rate to aspire to? Shouldn't we aspire at least a little higher now due to the deep-stacked structure?

Douper · #16 03-10-2005, 01:23 PM

That's what I was thinking jtr.

like I said I'm a new player, but calling $1 with a SC or 1 gap in LP has been paying me off huge when I'm deep. players still get married to TPTK, weather it's 50BB or 100BB they are calling off.

This was the type of stuff that I understood was different about the deeper stacks, you can pay more marginal hands since the implied odds are huge.

I'm new to NL online, it's been good to me so far, I'll grind out 10k hands and see where my winrate is at.

Yeti · #17 03-10-2005, 01:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Interesting to get your estimate and PFunk's estimate, Yeti. So my range of 12.5 -- 15 PTBB/100 as a cap for near-perfect play looks optimistic to you? Fair enough, you may very well be right. But didn't you always maintain that 10 was the rate to aspire to? Shouldn't we aspire at least a little higher now due to the deep-stacked structure?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm you may be right. Let's aspire to 12 then. I think any higher is pushing it. And lets have this over 50k hands.

thatpfunk · #18 03-10-2005, 01:53 PM

Ya, I was referring to the $25 and $50s specifically.

I would be very surprised if over 10 is not possible. I know that ~8 was possible before, so that seems like a very big drop.

Yeti · #19 03-10-2005, 02:22 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Ya, I was referring to the $25 and $50s specifically.

I would be very surprised if over 10 is not possible. I know that ~8 was possible before, so that seems like a very big drop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who knows whats possible at the 25s, I doubt most good players hang around there long enough to find out.

I doubt 16+ would be out of the realms of possibility at this level.

madscout · #20 03-10-2005, 03:15 PM

So my PT35BB/100 is 'running good' at the $25NL PP tables since I got poker tracker 4k hands ago? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]