#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
So I can still do classic under 35x? Tell me its true!!!
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
If you're going to do these, do them in pounds. I profited over 280 pounds (over $540) from this group. And autoplay 1 pound (or dollar) per hand. No benefit from increasing it. You don't have to sit there and play, so you might was well reduce your variance.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
Oh no, they raised the WR by ~20% and I have to play AC Blackjack instead of Vegas Strip and lose an extra $1.50 per $10,000 wagered. Gasp!
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
If I'd have had my autoplay set for the default 2 I'd have busted out my bonus at Cooks too. As it was, I ended with 109 which gave me 209 to start in my deposit account. Within 450 hands, I was down to 150 and starting to get nervous. I'd already LOST 31 at CON (-231 before bonus), and wasn't liking casino whoring too much.
Now I'm about 5000 hands in and am at a much more comfortable 230. And BTW, if it's +EV and you have a choice between USD and GBP, take GBP. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
[ QUOTE ]
Oh no, they raised the WR by ~20% and I have to play AC Blackjack instead of Vegas Strip and lose an extra $1.50 per $10,000 wagered. Gasp! [/ QUOTE ] Thanks Homer. Perhaps you could tell me: How much better is Atlantic City blackjack than downtown Vegas blackjack? And one other thing. I'm looking for the e-mail to be positive, but I'm sure it said I had to wager 35x (this is at Cooks before the change, which I'm playing now) on the bonus amount, and then when I've accomplished that I transfer the whole amount to the real account and then play 35x times the real money deposit, which in my case was £100. In other words you wager £200 x 35 or £7000 in the bonus account and then even though you must transfer it all over you only have to play 35x £100 in the real account. I'm 95% certain of this but of course I could be wrong. Does anyone know definitively? Thanks |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
Yes only 35x your deposit in your main account. Happy whoring!
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
[ QUOTE ]
Oh no, they raised the WR by ~20% and I have to play AC Blackjack instead of Vegas Strip and lose an extra $1.50 per $10,000 wagered. Gasp! [/ QUOTE ] Homer, I understand your point, but I think it's a $15 difference (.36% HA vs .5% HA?). [ QUOTE ] And one other thing. I'm looking for the e-mail to be positive, but I'm sure it said I had to wager 35x (this is at Cooks before the change, which I'm playing now) on the bonus amount, and then when I've accomplished that I transfer the whole amount to the real account and then play 35x times the real money deposit, which in my case was £100. In other words you wager £200 x 35 or £7000 in the bonus account and then even though you must transfer it all over you only have to play 35x £100 in the real account. I'm 95% certain of this but of course I could be wrong. Does anyone know definitively? [/ QUOTE ] According to the Casino Kingdom Terms and Conditions this is wrong. You DO need to rewager the transfered amount: [ QUOTE ] Deposit Account: You must wager any deposits made which enabled you to claim a bonus or promotion and (for non-VIP players only) any transfers from your Bonus Account to your Deposit Account a minimum of 42 times on most forms of Video Poker or Blackjack. (Please note that some forms of Poker and Blackjack will not contribute to the meeting of wagering requirements) [/ QUOTE ] I'm waiting for cashouts at Cooks and Classic, trying to decide if I should do Kingdom before Thursday. I'm waiting on almost $1500 in cashouts, so I'm scared of F'ing that up (by being labelled an abuser). I probably I shouldn't be scared. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
so what if you're in the middle of clearing bonus? Does none of it count then?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
Surprise, surprise, Homer was right and I was wrong. The AC rules HA isn't .5%, it's more like .37%. Disregard my first comment.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: It Looks Like it\'s too Late for Casino Classic and Casino Kingdom
Wizard of Odds has Atlantic City's HA listed as 0.365% as compared to Vegas Strip's HA of 0.3606%:
http://www.wizardofodds.com/software/microgaming.html With these new numbers, here are the bonuses for Vegas Strip and 35WR: Captain Cooks: deposit $100 for $216 bonus. Playthrough = ($100 + $216 + $216) * 35WR = $18,620 $216 - 0.3606% HA * $18,620 = <font color="blue">net +$148.85</font> Casino Kingdom: deposit $60 for $136 bonus. Playthrough = ($60 + $136 + $136) * 35WR = $11,620 $136 - 0.3606% HA * $11,620 = <font color="blue">net +$94.09</font> Casino Classic: deposit $150 for $166 bonus. Playthrough = ($150 + $166 + $166) * 35WR = $16,870 $166 - 0.3606% HA * $16,840 = <font color="blue">net +$105.16</font> Here are the numbers for Atlantic City and 42WR: Captain Cooks: deposit $100 for $216 bonus. Playthrough = ($100 + $216 + $216) * 42WR = $22,344 $216 - 0.365% HA * $22,344 = <font color="blue">net +$134.44</font> Casino Kingdom: deposit $60 for $136 bonus. Playthrough = ($60 + $136 + $136) * 42WR = $13,944 $136 - 0.365% HA * $13,944 = <font color="blue">net +$85.10</font> Casino Classic: deposit $150 for $166 bonus. Playthrough = ($150 + $166 + $166) * 42WR = $20,244 $166 - 0.365% HA * $20,244 = <font color="blue">net +$92.10</font> Basically the new WR reduces the bonuses by about 7-12%. Multiply the USD * 1.96 to get a rough approximation as to how much the bonus is worth if you signed up in GBP. |
|
|