Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:01 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: KQo flop decision

Go for the c/r.

However, a case could be made to bet out hoping the UTG will raise. Your c/r may also have the same effect. Besides, you have a great drawing hand.

b
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:01 PM
Derek in NYC Derek in NYC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 130
Default Re: KQo flop decision

Check.

You are on a str8 draw to the non-nuts (i.e., flush threat) out of position. If you were on the button, you could be aggressive, but with your non-nut draw you cannot risk being taken on a multi-bet ride.

The K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] adds substantial value to your hand, although even here it is not a nut draw, and a 1-card second nut flush draw is not something you can play aggressively out of position.

The only caveat I have to this is that if a scarecard [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] falls and freezes the action, a semibluff raise of a late position bettor can be highly effective.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:10 PM
admiralfluff admiralfluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 540
Default Re: KQo flop decision

I would think a check raise here would be bad. If LAG 3 bets it, cold callers will only fold hands that you don't want to fold. Do you agree with what I and others said earlier, that it is probably useless to try and free up your overcard outs, because any hand that has you dominated will probably not fold this flop? Also, with the possible flush draw out there, pumping may not be the best idea. Where do you see the check raise having an advantage over the check call to turn check raise should you improve? Thanks in advance if you reply to my lowly member questions.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:15 PM
Nick C Nick C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,582
Default Re: KQo flop decision

As a disclaimer, I'll say that I don't know the 15/30 at all. But given the numbers provided, I do think we could be up against a very wide range of hands here. Even when under the gun, a player who raises preflop 17 percent of the time will probably do so with a lot of hands. Also, a postflop aggression factor of 1.6 isn't really that high, so while I expect UTG to bet the flop, I'm not going to assume he will.

If the other players are paying any attention, then they should know UTG is raising light, and thus they might cold-call lighter than usual too.

I don't know exactly how significant any of this is, even if correct, but I thought I'd bring it up. If nothing else, it could mean that not as many of our outs are in other people's hands as we might fear.

Anyway, my first instinct was to lead the flop, but then I had trouble thinking of many hands that will fold and create additional outs for my king and queen. I started favoring the checkraise plan next, but btspider's and The Dude's arguments that the 3-bet potential (from UTG) is a drawback to this plan swayed me, and now I think check-calling is probably the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:29 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: KQo flop decision

[ QUOTE ]
I would think a check raise here would be bad. If LAG 3 bets it, cold callers will only fold hands that you don't want to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

What's wrong with getting it HU with a LAG given your hand?

[ QUOTE ]
because any hand that has you dominated will probably not fold this flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

Like what? AK or AQ? Any hand that dominates you you don't really mind if they call given your draw. If they don't have a flush card with it, which is unlikely given your hand, they may very well fold. That may be giving them a little too much credit for thinking though. Many would just call anyway hoping to hit one of their overcards, drawing to 2 outs, btw. Then they'd likely fold the turn after missing. It isn't too bad if they hit their Ace, is it?

[ QUOTE ]
Where do you see the check raise having an advantage over the check call to turn check raise should you improve?

[/ QUOTE ]

I like the check/call, c/r the turn also. However, if others also see this player as LAG, they may be likely to call his 3 bet after putting a bet in already thinking he's just being his LAGGY self. Some LAGs will slow down when c/r'd. C/r is a strong move that many don't do with draws. Depends on the table, really. One read could sway me one way or the other.

b
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:48 PM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: KQo flop decision

Check, is this close ?

I dont think you can clean outs or anything here. IŽll check-raise if he bets and both of the others call, else check-call.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:51 PM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: KQo flop decision

Actually I didn't see there were two unknowns to act behind PFR. If both call I would checkraise for value, if one called I would check call.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:57 PM
Poker Chief Poker Chief is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 11
Default Re: KQo flop decision

For those who said check raise for value, how much equity do you think you really have in this pot? It is very likely that a couple of your Ace outs are gone, and there is a flush draw on board.

What if every goes as planned and you trap the two cold callers, what do you do when the turn bricks?

I don't think you can win this hand without a showdown, and I don't think you have a huge pot equity, so do you want to c/r?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-03-2005, 09:02 PM
KidPokerX KidPokerX is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, California
Posts: 23
Default Re: KQo flop decision

those aren't small stakes to me.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-04-2005, 02:55 AM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Results/Comments??? n/m

nm
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.