|
|
#11
11-27-2004, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: data mining?
Wow, I thought this was just an innocent question to see who were the "feared" players on the 5-10 tables. Since I have gobs of my own data, I haven't any need for input on this issue, but I thought it would be interesting. Consider the question un-asked lol!
Would it be okay to ask who people think are the biggest loudmouths on the 5-10 tables? I can think of a few myself, but I'm curious to know what other people think. 
|
|
#12
11-27-2004, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: data mining?
[ QUOTE ]
Since I have gobs of my own data [/ QUOTE ] You keep mentioning this. Why do you want input from others? In all honesty, I know you haven't had a very warm welcome in your bad beat post in the general forum, but these types of posts work better there. In the Small Stakes forum, there's been a concerted effort to stick to hand discussions, and weed out the extraneous posts. Well, threads about other people's sisters, and clever poems being excepted.
|
|
#13
11-27-2004, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: data mining?
It was just an innocent question!
Honestly, I kinda wanted to see if I would get mentioned, heh. I also wanted to see if the players I thought were amazing give off that vibe to others. Really, I didn't mean to attempt to get detailed info or anything of the sort.
|
|
#14
11-27-2004, 02:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: data mining?
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I kinda wanted to see if I would get mentioned, heh. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm. Honestly, a lot of people don't like to talk about specific names on Party. Your post is a different angle, but threads talking about who the big fish are usually don't get many responses either, people don't want to discuss that info. Use this part of the forum to discuss interesting hands. Regardless of how good you think you are, and how good you hope everyone else thinks you are, you must have a hand once in a while that makes you scratch your head and wonder if there was a better line, or better read you could have made. Just don't post bad beats, and people won't be so quick to flame your responses.
|
|
#15
11-27-2004, 02:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
that guy sstinkypetes is awesome. watch out. i have 0 hands on him in 5/10 full but he just scares me with his awesomeness.
|
|
#16
11-27-2004, 03:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
I don't play 5/10 so I wouldn't be able to give a list of players, but I wouldn't put too much stock in your own mining for anything but knowing if someone is a halfway decent player. Keep in mind that you could have 100% of the hands played on party for six months and still miss a lot of people in the top 10% of play quality
|
|
#17
11-27-2004, 03:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: data mining?
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I kinda wanted to see if I would get mentioned, heh. [/ QUOTE ] I'm surprised since you said in the other thread you were sure you could beat many of the top posters/players here. Why would someone as good as you need reassurance from worse players? Oh wait...ok.
|
|
#18
11-27-2004, 03:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
This just isn't going to end well...
|
|
#20
11-27-2004, 04:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
[ QUOTE ]
that guy sstinkypetes is awesome. watch out. i have 0 hands on him in 5/10 full but he just scares me with his awesomeness. [/ QUOTE ] i agree. wont sit at the same table with him. also heard he eats children
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
