|
|
#1
11-26-2004, 11:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
I know who I think is really good, but I'd like to hear other opinions. I've data mined for months, so I have detailed stats on pretty much every player, and I'd like to find out how your subjective assessments match up to my objective criteria.
Feel free to post some loudmouths/maniacs/whatever too for kicks if you want. I enjoy the loudmouths a lot. 
|
|
#7
11-27-2004, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 10-handed 5-10 players on Party?
you and dataminer are my favorite new posters.
edit: to make this post "useful", let me quote myself from 8 days ago: "I won't equivocate: naming names sucks, and I hereby crap on this thread."
|
|
#8
11-27-2004, 01:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
data mining?
I know that a fair number of people do it, but the whole idea, makes me uncomfortable. It seems that if you are putting money on the line in a game, and you notice something, or find something in a hand history, then you have earned the right to use that information. If all you are doing is collecting data, then the whole idea seems to tilt the playing field and seems a little bit slimy to me. Anyone else think this, or is everyone ok with datamining?
|
|
#9
11-27-2004, 01:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: data mining?
[ QUOTE ]
I know that a fair number of people do it, but the whole idea, makes me uncomfortable. It seems that if you are putting money on the line in a game, and you notice something, or find something in a hand history, then you have earned the right to use that information. If all you are doing is collecting data, then the whole idea seems to tilt the playing field and seems a little bit slimy to me. Anyone else think this, or is everyone ok with datamining? [/ QUOTE ] Hi Bob, I don't know why you posted that in this thread but anyway, check out a current thread in the zoo about this. I think it's fine.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
