10,000 hand check up - Any pointers

[jmark]

[ QUOTE ]
Here's my 6 max data. I don't play 6 max. much.

2080 hands
VP$IP 47.40
WR -5.99BB/100
PFR 26.20


[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Here's what I know about the villian. VP$IP ~45%. PFR 23%. I've seen about 20 hands. I'd say maniac.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just thought this would be funny to point out. Watch out or you might start playing speculative hands against yourself since you'll payoff with a pair of aces, 8 kicker.

[jjb108]

Its sad but true...I'm working on it. And I have paid off too many crappy hands of late.

[gergery]

Yeah, your numbers are way high for fullring game.

My 2 cents:
6BB/100 You can get this to 10bb/100, and even higher, but 6>0, lol
hands_played 10288 Still early to tell for sure
vpip_sum 27.5369 I’d think ~18 here, at NL25, upto 23 or so is ok
pfr_sum 13.3942 also high, I’d think ~7
wsd_sum 49.945 also high, I’d think ~30, with Won/Sdwn ~60 is good
vpip_sb 47.0769 also high. I’d think ~35


For shorthanded for $NL 50, I’ve broken out my opponents into quartiles. It turns out that these are the cutoffs

Tightest <30%
Kinda Tight 30-42%
Kinda Loose 42-56%
Loose 56%+

So to the other posters here, if your VPIP is ~20, then you are tighter than ~90% of all shorthanded players. That’s pretty damn tight. And I don’t mind seeing people that tight at my table, as it’s pretty easy to put them on a hand when they play and doesn’t take too long to calibrate the bullying to steal relentlessly if they don’t adjust. I think it definitely gives up EV for lower variance. I haven’t figured out the right numbers, but I think low 30s VPIP with PFR ~10% seems about right. The shorthanded NL 100 tho seems significantly tighter, and I’d guess VPIP ~25% to be correct there.

Just my 2 cents.

Btw, nice playing with you the other night at 2+2 game

--Greg

[aLittleFish]

I'm either making a full of myself with this post, but I really thing something is wrong here. According to your amount of money won, you average $5.9754 per 100 hands played. When the blinds are .25/.50, its my understanding that that winrate is HUGE. I may be competely misunderstanding the whole BB/100 hands cause if not I'm not, than it turns out I'm a really bad player.

[fimbulwinter]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm either making a full of myself with this post, but I really thing something is wrong here. According to your amount of money won, you average $5.9754 per 100 hands played. When the blinds are .25/.50, its my understanding that that winrate is HUGE. I may be competely misunderstanding the whole BB/100 hands cause if not I'm not, than it turns out I'm a really bad player.

[/ QUOTE ]

bwa?

his winrate is 5.9 big bets/100, or twice that in big blinds. both numbers are pretty small actually; the majority of 2+2'ers make considerably more.

you sure you aren't misreading this as $590/100 hands?

[Pogue]

Yup... You made a "full" of yourself, alright.. Please note: This is small stakes NL, NOT limit.

Pogue

[aLittleFish]

As someone else already pointed out, I stille may being making a "full" of myself (typos are bad), but I'll elaborate so some one can explain where I'm messing up...

$614.75 Total won
10,288 Total hands

if you divide one by the other, 614.75/10288, you get the amount of dollars won per hand. This gives you .05975, which if multiplied by 100 will give the amount of money won per 100 hands (5.975). Its my understanding this should only be coincidentally the same as BB/100 when the BB is $1.00. Isn't BB here .50?

My guess is I'm prolly posting way too later and way too early to be thinking clearly, but either way I'm still confused.

[aLittleFish]

Party Poker = .25/.50 blinds which means a Big Bet would be a $1!! I feel really stupid. I always forget to stop thinking about Party Poker blinds as .10/.25. I'll also add that it being displayed as Big Bet instead of big blinds makes the numbers make a whole lot more sense. I'm not sure why but I ran it through my head as about 6 big blinds per 100 so when you take 6 big blinds/100 of .25 over about 10,000 hands, its a "tad" less than $600. Now that I've turned into a posting disaster, I'm gonna go play guitar, one of many things apparently I'm retarded at.

[jjb108]

Well here's a quick update on my stats and results. I believe another vote for tight aggressive play.

Here are my stats for my last 3600 hands...(small sample size disclaimer is of course in effect)
VP$IP 19.00
VP$SB 28.90

BB/100 - 9.73 vs 5.9 before on the way up (small sample size disclaimer of course)

PFR 3.89%
PF agg 0.5
Flop 3.01
Turn 2.63
River 2.09

Even if its just a good run of cards, my numbers look better. Thanks for all the advice.