Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2004, 10:51 PM
Leonardo Leonardo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 15
Default The greats

How much time do you think they spend analyzing situations, replaying hands and making calculations etc? It seems to me that great chess players spend the majority of their time not actually playing chess, but analyzing different situations, moves etc. The best golfers practice putting, chipping, hit balls at the range for almost infinately more hours than actually playing. Same for most sports. How many minutes does Kobe spend practicing jumpers for every minute spent on court? Tonnes. My point is, how long does Chan, Seidel, Negreanu, Helmuth, Reese, Brunson, Varkonyi(lol) spend away from the table analyzing , per hour spent playing. To me it seems like not so much. Lots of pro poker players seems to play 40 hours a week (+ or - ) and maybe a few hours analyzing. Will this change with the introduction of such large prizes at tournaments (> 2 mill eg). I think that although these players are considered great, we will see a whole new type of player over the next ten years, who will be on a whole new level.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2004, 10:57 PM
neoliminal neoliminal is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: The greats

Much of what happens in poker is specific to the time and place of the action. Unlike chess, you are unlikely to find yourself in exactly the same postion/hand/chip/players.

Because it's situational, you're less likely to get benefit from scouting your opponents or reading theory.

I would think the most important thing would be to keep current on the trends. For example, the large influx of new players and the introduction of an 'online' style of play are both big factors in the way the pro's have to play in tournaments.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2004, 04:46 AM
zoziac zoziac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: The greats

Just a brief note to say that i think your chess reference is very innacurate. Finding yourself in the same position in a chess game is much less common than HE. I think that similar situations are much more common in poker. Maybe other players of both games think differently though.

zoziac
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2004, 06:19 AM
PairTheBoard PairTheBoard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 46
Default Re: The greats

I think top chess players spend a lot of time coming up with and studying new innovations in established openings. There's almost limitless research challenges in that area.

PairTheBoard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2004, 03:50 PM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 307
Default Re: The greats

Hi Leonardo,
I think you're way off base, here. I personally spend many hours a week thinking about poker, analyzing common situations, mostly, but also reviewing/revising my notebook on players, etc., in order to get better. I'm sure that many other good players do the same. I'm certain that most great players do that, if they are trying to get better at poker.
Now, I'm also sure that great players don't spend as much time in analysis as they did early in their careers, as there's just not as much to be gained, once you reach expert status. But good players (and anyone better)have spent a lot of time and energy determining how to win at poker.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.