Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2003, 02:07 PM
Tyler Durden Tyler Durden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: DC area (Arlington, VA)
Posts: 1,351
Default Should Moneymaker have shown?

A friend and I got into a discussion the other day about the bluff of the century by Chris Moneymaker vs. Sammy Farha.



Should he have shown his bluff after Farha folded the winner? I think yes, for the tilt factor. My buddy says no, so he can pull it off again.

Thoughts/comments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2003, 03:17 PM
Yeknom58 Yeknom58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 552
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

I say no. What would be accomplised by putting a guy like sammy on tilt. He already plays pretty loose pre-flop. I don't think you want a guy like sammy get MORE agressive on you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2003, 06:04 PM
LJH LJH is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

NO WAY SHOLD MONEMAKER SHOW HIS CARDS. LET FARHA WATCH THE SHOW LATER AS WE ALL DO. LJH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2003, 06:09 PM
The Gift Of Gab The Gift Of Gab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 161
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?


I don't know if he should have shown it or not, but I think something Moneymaker said after the hand gave away the fact that he'd just bluffed Farha.

I don't remember the exchange word for word, but Farha starts bullsh*tting about having folded a pair of queens. Moneymaker says that the highest card on the board was a ten, and asks if Farha had a pair of queens in his hand.

Wasn't the highest card on board a nine? Something like 986xx with Ks7x for MM and Qs9x for Farha?

It could have been just a nervous slip. But if I were Farha I'd think that if MM didn't know what the cards on the board were, then he'd probably been firing on air.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2003, 07:33 PM
Tyler Durden Tyler Durden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: DC area (Arlington, VA)
Posts: 1,351
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

[ QUOTE ]
But if I were Farha I'd think that if MM didn't know what the cards on the board were, then he'd probably been firing on air.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well not necessarily. I think Farha put him on a flush, b/c Moneymaker raised the turn when the flush got there, then bet everything on the river. It's not strange for one to forget what the cards were if they made a flush.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2003, 06:55 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

Farha is probably too seasoned to go on tilt from one bluff.

Short-handed, being able to steal a big pot is worth a lot more than getting somebody to make a call when you've got a big hand. You just don't get enough big hands to make up for all the times you'd like them to fold.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2003, 07:32 PM
J_V J_V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

Tilt Factor? C'mon, Farha is a seasoned pro and it's the most important match he's ever gonna play.

He should not show and it's not close.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2003, 07:35 PM
Tyler Durden Tyler Durden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: DC area (Arlington, VA)
Posts: 1,351
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

[ QUOTE ]
C'mon, Farha is a seasoned pro and it's the most important match he's ever gonna play.

He should not show and it's not close.

[/ QUOTE ]


You may be right but isn't the fact that it's the most important match of his career the reason why he WOULD tilt?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2003, 07:41 PM
J_V J_V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

I never thought about it from that perspective.

I wouldn't tilt in this position simply cuz it would be hard to live with yourself if you did, but it's possible someone else might. Good point, but I still wouldn't show [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2003, 05:08 PM
JohnG JohnG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 192
Default Re: Should Moneymaker have shown?

[ QUOTE ]
You may be right but isn't the fact that it's the most important match of his career the reason why he WOULD tilt?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would guess it wasn't farha's most important match. I'd guess the title of world champion wouldn't mean much to him. He knows it means nothing. He's a high stakes gambler, not a tourney player. In it for a chance of the big score rather than any title. That's my guess anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.