#1
|
|||
|
|||
what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (6 handed) converter
MP ($8.14) CO ($2.23) Button ($4.75) Hero ($3.65) BB ($2.13) UTG ($6.24) Preflop: Hero is SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $0.04</font>, MP calls $0.04, CO calls $0.04, Button calls $0.04, Hero calls $0.03, BB calls $0.02. Flop: ($0.24) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets $0.04</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $0.08</font>, MP calls $0.08, CO calls $0.08, Button calls $0.08, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $3.61</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $3.53, MP calls $3.53, CO folds, Button folds. Turn: ($11.27) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> UTG checks, MP checks. River: ($11.27) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $0.2</font>, MP folds. Final Pot: $11.47 UTG: shows [J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] (two pair, Queens and Sixes) Hero: shows [J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] (a straight, Ten to Ace) Hero collected $10.72 from pot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
wait thats not a bad beat
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
Reread the title of the forum, specifically the 2nd word.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
no offense dude but this hand is pedestrian in every facet, cept for maybe the amount of blinds involved in the end
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
He folded getting 573.5-1, that's reasonable. I usually need at least 600 to one to call a bet on the river without a hand that I'm sure is the best. Great laydown.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
He did what Diablo could not.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
[ QUOTE ]
He folded getting 573.5-1, that's reasonable. I usually need at least 600 to one to call a bet on the river without a hand that I'm sure is the best. Great laydown. [/ QUOTE ] The fold is even easier when you realize that he's only getting 57.35:1. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what have we here... (caution: low stakes ahead)
[ QUOTE ]
MICHAEL: Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. [censored]. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|