Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2005, 07:18 PM
Allin72 Allin72 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6
Default Jets -3?

Going to this ugly game tonight and looking for some action. Thinking jets -3 is best bet here? Anyone see anything better? Possibly Tease it to jets +3 and the over 31? Any thoughts appreciated
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2005, 07:27 PM
jedinite jedinite is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Jets -3?

The tease across zero really isn't as valuable as you imagine it should be. Especially moving -3 to +3 - you're not really crossing any key numbers (you're just moving from a push at a common number of three to a push at another common number of three).

Jets -3 (+105) is available right now at Bodog - thats a pretty decent line.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2005, 08:44 PM
DalaiLama DalaiLama is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 27
Default Re: Jets -3?

im on the jets as well. They play much better at home while n.o. is absolutely horrible on the road. Of course, they've been on the road all year though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2005, 08:56 PM
tech tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Default Re: Jets -3?

[ QUOTE ]
Jets -3 (+105) is available right now at Bodog - thats a pretty decent line.


[/ QUOTE ]

That is a horrendously bad line. The Jets were an underdog early in the week and -1 and -2 were both available as recently as yesterday.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2005, 09:07 PM
jedinite jedinite is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Jets -3?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Jets -3 (+105) is available right now at Bodog - thats a pretty decent line.


[/ QUOTE ]

That is a horrendously bad line. The Jets were an underdog early in the week and -1 and -2 were both available as recently as yesterday.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm speaking purely in terms of the parent post - i.e. if you were sitting right now and wanted to put action on one side of this game.

I would not touch this game with other people's money, but just saying if I'm going to have to play one side I think i'd take the Jets -3 (+105).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2005, 09:16 PM
DalaiLama DalaiLama is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 27
Default Re: Jets -3?

That is a horrendously bad line. The Jets were an underdog early in the week and -1 and -2 were both available as recently as yesterday.


I too realize this, but want something on the game to keep me awake during this steam fest. 1/2 a unit or less.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2005, 09:20 PM
VarlosZ VarlosZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 68
Default Re: Jets -3?

I've got a nice middle here, with Jets +2 (-108) and Saints +2.5 (+100).

I wouldn't give 3 with the Jets if I were you. Both teams are awful, so why lay points?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2005, 09:27 PM
lastsamurai lastsamurai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: la la land
Posts: 222
Default Re: Jets -3?

It looks like a vegas trap to me...I would take the jets blind in this game.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2005, 09:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Jets -3?

I feel this game is a total coin flip. I got the Saints at +125 pk on the money line at BetWWTS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-28-2005, 12:29 AM
VarlosZ VarlosZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 68
Default Re: Jets -3?

Make the kick, make the kick. . .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.