#1
|
|||
|
|||
Signatures
It looks like signatures have been turned back on. Is this something that was a conscious decision? I remember them being explicitly turned off because they were a spam vehicle.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
It also appears that Graemlins, Instant UBB code, and font color all dont work in firefox now.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
Wow this upgrade is absolutely horendous. The fact that I can no longer use firefox is bad, just bad. Mat, can we somehow roll back to the old version until these things get fixed. It also looks like the censor isn't working and that's going to cause major issues I'm sure.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
I agree that the absence of the filter could be a big problem.
Also, the Instant code not working is true in all browsers, not just firefox. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
Some guy thinks he's found the Java bug that broke the instant code:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
While we're listing problems, it looks like, when browsing in threaded mode, threads that are all on the same level (all posts that are replies to the original post, for example) are shown in reverse chronological order, backwards from what would be normal.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
One more thing. It used to be that you could type out a partial post, hit the back button on your browser to check something, and then hit forward to finish your post. Hitting back now wipes your post. I definitely miss having this ability.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
Yeah, I used to do that ALL the time. Now it will re-post the data. Blah. All of this for a few new features. Definitely not worth it.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Signatures
[ QUOTE ]
One more thing. It used to be that you could type out a partial post, hit the back button on your browser to check something, and then hit forward to finish your post. Hitting back now wipes your post. I definitely miss having this ability. [/ QUOTE ] Yes! This is already driving me nuts. |
|
|