#1
|
|||
|
|||
JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
Villain is a 50/30 type guy, very aggressive postflop. We've played a few hands together and he hasn't won any of them. He hasn't seen a showdown against me. Hero is a marauding ghoul.
It's 5 handed, I'm the cutoff and villain is the button. I raise with JT and button calls. I would guess I have the better hand. I begin to suspect immediately that he will try to outplay me postflop. He will start by raising the flop when I bet. The SB folds and the BB calls. The flop is: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] I bet. He raises, which is not a surprise. The BB folds and I call. How was this? Edit: My plan here is to check raise the turn unless I hit an A/9 in which case I will bet. The turn is the 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. I check he bets I raise. He should fold now but he doesn't. He calls. How do you like the turn action? What is your plan for a river blank, a J/T, an A/9? The river is the J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. I check, he bets, I call. Good? This hand was a little tough for me. I pretty much knew when he was going to bet or raise on every street, which means I can't really give him a range of hands. I know he can fold and I know there's a good chance he doesn't have a hand worth showing down, but neither do I. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
I would have 3-bet the flop and just ploughed on.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
[ QUOTE ]
I would have 3-bet the flop and just ploughed on. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think our equity is that great against anything but a flop bluff. I think its better to call the flop raise, and pop the turn with any improvement. More money when your infront, less when your behind. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
[ QUOTE ]
Hero is a marauding ghoul. [/ QUOTE ] This is why I would play it like that. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
you realize that its a 3 big bet investment to get him to fold?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
[ QUOTE ]
you realize that its a 3 big bet investment to get him to fold? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. I don't really this was the best line but I don't know what is. When you see the flop, what is your plan? Keeping in mind that he hasn't made it to any showdowns. And there's actually a chance you have the best hand. Or 14 outs. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would have 3-bet the flop and just ploughed on. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think our equity is that great against anything but a flop bluff. I think its better to call the flop raise, and pop the turn with any improvement. More money when your infront, less when your behind. [/ QUOTE ] This is the line i'd use as well, i've tried everything else and this one seems to be the most +EV. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
my line is to call his raise. check and call the turn. lead the river if i hit a straight. check and call if i hit a pair or check and fold depending on his river tendencies.
one thing i like to pay close attention to is river tendencies. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
Don't try to outlag the lag. You likely have an equity edge against his range on the flop so jam. Be ok with checkcalling the turn if you miss I think, but I would have just 3bet the flop. The river action depends on how he plays 8s 5s and A high. If he bets those than check, if he checks them then bet.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JT Won\'t Need LAGs to Stand
[ QUOTE ]
my line is to call his raise. check and call the turn. lead the river if i hit a straight. check and call if i hit a pair or check and fold depending on his river tendencies. one thing i like to pay close attention to is river tendencies. [/ QUOTE ] I don't really like the passive line here because he's made it to so few showdowns. I don't remember if I mentioned it before, but he'd folded before showdown in every hand I was in him with, 3 or so. |
|
|