|
|
#1
10-03-2005, 03:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
87s in SB
I figure this is an easy complete from the SB, but I really don't like the flop. In the past, against loose fish who would play anything, I might have called with the OESD, but as I move up I run into players who actually know what they're doing. Even if I make the straight I'm not at all happy about it. At first glance I'm getting easy immediate odds at 9:1 with 8 outs, but I really don't want a jack and I don't want the 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] which only leaves 3 good outs. Anyone call this?
PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is SB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $1. UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO (poster) checks, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks. Flop: (7 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(7 players)</font> Hero checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls, CO folds, Button folds, Hero ? 
|
|
#2
10-03-2005, 04:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 87s in SB
fold. you're looking at around 3 outs for the 6 non-[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], if you're not losing to KJ already. small pot: bu bye.
|
|
#3
10-03-2005, 04:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 87s in SB
What he said.
|
|
#4
10-03-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 87s in SB
This is a pretty clear fold, since you only have 3 outs, at best. I'd be curious, though, how big the pot would have to be for folks before check/fold turns to check/call.
|
|
#5
10-03-2005, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 87s in SB
14sb for me
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
