#1
|
|||
|
|||
switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
hello, i started 400nl today and just wanted to know what the real good players here do with pocket pairs 66-TT. im assuming they raise with JJ-AA. what pockets below JJ do you guys raise with in the 400nl. or is limping it better? i do 6max only.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
In most games in the 400, I raise with all PPs from all positions in an unopened pot.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
[ QUOTE ]
In most games in the 400, I raise with all PPs from all positions in an unopened pot. [/ QUOTE ] Jim, are you talking 6max now or is 'most' also refering to full ring? (I know op asked about 6max) Reason I ask is that I work on raising more preflop. //Pug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
6-max only.
In full ring, I will usually just limp PPs < 88, or fold them in EP. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
Same, although I muck 22/33 in EP about half the time.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
I have started testing with rasing lower pairs when it's folded to me and its not so many people left that I want to fold.
Problem whe seeing flop is that I seldom feel so very strong. I have a a rather bad hand with few outs. //Pug |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
[ QUOTE ]
Problem whe seeing flop is that I seldom feel so very strong. I have a a rather bad hand with few outs. [/ QUOTE ] This is true, but it's amazing how often a continuation bet takes it down. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Problem whe seeing flop is that I seldom feel so very strong. I have a a rather bad hand with few outs. [/ QUOTE ] This is true, but it's amazing how often a continuation bet takes it down. [/ QUOTE ] I'm just learning, and a little confused. How does this reasoning for raising with PP have anything to do with the fact that you have a PP? Seems to apply to any 2. I mean, 72o often flops a bad hand with few outs, and if you raise with it you'll often take the pot down with a continuation bet. And if you've got a low PP, if the flop gets any piece of your opponent you're typically behind. So if your CB gets called, you also might as well have any 2. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
A PP has much better outs than 72o
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: switched from 55\'s to 400NL. questoin about 6max
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just learning, and a little confused. How does this reasoning for raising with PP have anything to do with the fact that you have a PP? Seems to apply to any 2. I mean, 72o often flops a bad hand with few outs, and if you raise with it you'll often take the pot down with a continuation bet. And if you've got a low PP, if the flop gets any piece of your opponent you're typically behind. So if your CB gets called, you also might as well have any 2. [/ QUOTE ] Nah.. Your PP have a lot more value. 1) You have some chances to get really good hand. You have seen four communitycards if they call your contnuationbet. 2) You actually have a pair. It's more often you are ahead of a calling AK-hand after the flop has shown then you are behind. //Pug |
|
|