#1
|
|||
|
|||
PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
Hero is MP with J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Action: UTG limps, Hero limps, Button Limps, SB completes, BB checks Pot size $5 dollars Flop K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Blinds check, UTG bets 3, Hero raises to 12, Button and Blinds fold UTG calls 9 more Pot Size = $29 Turn card 5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG checks, Hero checks River 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] UTG bets 15, Hero ? pot size $44 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
Call getting 3-1. No point in raising.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
[ QUOTE ]
Call getting 3-1. No point in raising. [/ QUOTE ] What do you think of the TURN check? Should I have bet one more time and fold to a big check raise? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
I don't like the check on the turn. If you think you have the best hand why not bet out again and fold to a raise. That way you can take the river for free (assuming he doesn't bet into you on the river).
I think he's only betting because you showed weakness by checking. I would call, but I wouldn't be too happy about it. I think betting the turn for a free showdown is better. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
This is 6-max?
raise pre-flop, go from there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
[ QUOTE ]
This is 6-max? raise pre-flop, go from there. [/ QUOTE ] This is not necessary. [ QUOTE ] What do you think of the TURN check? Should I have bet one more time and fold to a big check raise? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. Check behind on the river. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
Alright, thanks guys! I really hate these top pair marginal type kicker hands in NL, and since I have played alot of limit before, those hands really killed me at first when I jumped into NL. I figured the check on the turn was kind of dumb, so came here to confirm if my thoughts of an alternate play were better.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
call the river
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is 6-max? raise pre-flop, go from there. [/ QUOTE ] This is not necessary. [/ QUOTE ] You really wouldn't raise this PF? Playing a hand like this in the first place is tough enough, playing a hand like this multiway against unknown hand strengths... that's really hard. Can you explain why you would limp this in 6-max? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PARTY 100 NL HAND analysis needed
So that players like me won't smoothcall on the button with AK and trap me.
I don't like building pots from mid position with crap hands like KJs. Now, give me one loose limper and KJs on the button, I'll raise that every time. |
|
|