Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Other Poker Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2005, 04:46 AM
Notorious G.O.B. Notorious G.O.B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: four thousand dollar suit
Posts: 112
Default Chinese Poker hand

Four handed pokerroom, I'm dealt 777555KK99AT8. The two options I see are:
a. 77799 555KK AT8, and
b. 77799 555T8 KKA
I opted for a, since there's a one point bonus for a full house in the middle, and I felt Ace high had a reasonable chance up front. I was I correct, or should I have gone with b?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2005, 01:46 PM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

[ QUOTE ]
Four handed pokerroom, I'm dealt 777555KK99AT8. The two options I see are:
a. 77799 555KK AT8, and
b. 77799 555T8 KKA
I opted for a, since there's a one point bonus for a full house in the middle, and I felt Ace high had a reasonable chance up front. I was I correct, or should I have gone with b?

[/ QUOTE ]

First of all, B should read 55599 777T8 KKA, you had trips set incorrectly.

You will profit the greatest in the long run by not breaking the middle boat. However if it was a non-bonus game, breaking the middle boat is the best strategy due to the value of the middle trips and the pair.

For the record, this is a rather hard hand to play. Good one.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2005, 09:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Four handed pokerroom, I'm dealt 777555KK99AT8. The two options I see are:
a. 77799 555KK AT8, and
b. 77799 555T8 KKA
I opted for a, since there's a one point bonus for a full house in the middle, and I felt Ace high had a reasonable chance up front. I was I correct, or should I have gone with b?

[/ QUOTE ]

First of all, B should read 55599 777T8 KKA, you had trips set incorrectly.

You will profit the greatest in the long run by not breaking the middle boat. However if it was a non-bonus game, breaking the middle boat is the best strategy due to the value of the middle trips and the pair.

For the record, this is a rather hard hand to play. Good one.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

When does triple ever beat full house?
Best play is easily two full houses.

Your 7's full are decent, but they're not great. Take the easy win with the bonus.

I'd probably play it greedy if it was >= J's full on bottom.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:48 AM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

[ QUOTE ]
When does triple ever beat full house?
Best play is easily two full houses.

[/ QUOTE ]

Read Don Somolen's book, then look at your statement again. The bonus structure means the hero should play the two full houses, however without a bonus the Hero has a greater expected value by splitting the smaller full house.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2005, 05:55 AM
Notorious G.O.B. Notorious G.O.B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: four thousand dollar suit
Posts: 112
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

I'm curious, how weak would the front hand has to be to justify splitting up a full house, if it is ever justified? Also, is it a general rule that with a full house in back and trips in the middle, you put the lower trips in back? Unfortunately, I don't have the chinese poker software, so I can't check it myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-2005, 07:33 AM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 418
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

yeah but you had 5's full in the back and 7's full in the middle, you gotta reverse that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-2005, 08:30 AM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

The software won't tell you this, the book by Don will. There are complicated charts to determine the optimum results for this hand, sometimes (and this is one of those times) I had to refer to the book.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-2005, 08:31 AM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

[ QUOTE ]
yeah but you had 5's full in the back and 7's full in the middle, you gotta reverse that.

[/ QUOTE ]

No I didn't silly [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

5's full in the back and trip 7's in the middle if there is no bonus system, or 7's full in the back and 5's full in the middle if there is.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-08-2005, 11:35 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Chinese Poker hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
When does triple ever beat full house?
Best play is easily two full houses.

[/ QUOTE ]

Read Don Somolen's book, then look at your statement again. The bonus structure means the hero should play the two full houses, however without a bonus the Hero has a greater expected value by splitting the smaller full house.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

What does the book have to do with any of the questions I asked?

The OP indicated that there was a bonus. Therefore, Two full houses is best. Do you agree?

And what's your reasoning for having 5's full at the back instead of 7's full?

Are you saying if someone has quad 2's, that you should have a higher middle to protect yourself?

This is true, but there is little gap between 5 and 7. If someone has 3 6's in their hand, it's likely to go in the back.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.