Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:07 PM
Rev. Good Will Rev. Good Will is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: failing computer science
Posts: 591
Default review: hand 63

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
2 folds, Button raises, 1 fold, MICROPOSTER 3-bets, Button calls.

Flop: (6.33 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 players)
MICROPOSTER bets, Button calls.

Turn: (4.16 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 players)
MICROPOSTER bets, Button calls.

River: (6.16 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 players)
MICROPOSTER checks, Button checks.

Final Pot: 6.16 BB

at the turn, hero has 2 choices right now:

1 - slow down considerably

2 - continue firing

since hero chose #2, methinks hero should bet the river as well, since the J only reduces the amount of cards that could sink hero right now.

I sorta have beef with the turn bet, but I guess its kosher since villian has a wide range of hands here... would the hero fold to a raise?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:11 PM
cold_cash cold_cash is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 412
Default Re: review: hand 63

This seems fine to me.

I think you're more likely to get a bet out of a hand like AT or 55 than you are to get a call out of one, especially in a (presumably) agressive short-handed game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:17 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: review: hand 63

My thoughts here: I want to show down against all kinds of A-high hands and other crap, and I don't want to have to sweat calling a potential bluff raise on the river (however unlikely).

Hence, check/call. I think more crappy hands will bluff when I check than will call when I bet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:18 PM
benkath1 benkath1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: review: hand 63

A wide range of hands indeed. I like the turn bet and I assume the river would be check call. Similar to the other 88 hand where the river brought an A, this time the J is a little less scary and bluff inducement may be successful. I think this is another hand where reads might sway actions.

There sure are a lot of checked showdowns in this session. Is that normal in higher limits?

PS Happy Birthday!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2005, 12:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: review: hand 63

[ QUOTE ]
There sure are a lot of checked showdowns in this session. Is that normal in higher limits?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, actually! This was somewhat of an unusual session.

I was consciously trying to mix up my play. Also, one thing I've really been working on is getting to showdown more often.... probably in the wrong spots a lot of the time. All the comments and questions of my play so far have been very valuable. Keep 'em up!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.