Two Plus Two Older Archives Standard Deviation questions.
 FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

#1
08-20-2005, 03:09 PM
 OrianasDaad Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 476
Standard Deviation questions.

I've done some searching, but came up with nothing very conclusive.

How many hands does a person have to play to have 90% confidence in their SD? 75%? How confident can a person be in their SD after say only 1000 hands?

My search results turned up some vague posts about how it needs to be "many, many hands". This, or course, is obvious, but I'm interested seeing how this is calculated.

My question is because it seems that people are always asking about winrate, and SD is often just a number that appears to be just "plugged-in", regardless of the confidence of that number.

#2
08-20-2005, 05:49 PM
 tworooks Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 440
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

746,931 hands
#3
08-21-2005, 12:45 AM
 OrianasDaad Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 476
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

[ QUOTE ]
but I'm interested seeing how this is calculated.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've got more posts than you, so you aren't allowed to be a smartass. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
#4
08-21-2005, 02:48 AM
 OrianasDaad Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 476
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

[ QUOTE ]
746,931 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, you can troll my thread better than this.
#5
08-21-2005, 10:19 AM
 AaronBrown Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: New York Posts: 505
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

I think you are heading down a bad path, a guy named William Gosset figured out the right way about a hundred years ago.

You measure something by an average (like poker winrate) and you want to know how much you can trust it. So you measure standard deviation to get a confidence interval. But then you wonder how much you can trust standard deviation, so you measure standard deviation of standard deviation. Then SD of SD of SD. Of course, you never get satisfied.

Gosset proved that under certain assumptions, you can collapse all the uncertainties into a single distribution, called the Student-t (he published under the name "Student" because his employer, Guinness Beer, didn't want the brewery business associated with anything as disreputable as statistics.

With more than 30 observations, unless you're going way out into the tail (like wanting a 99.999% confidence interval for your win rate), the Student t is quite close to the Normal. With a Normal you go 1.96 standard deviations to either side of the mean for a 95% confidence interval, with a Student t with 30 observations you go 2.05 standard deviations. Since you need at least 1,000 observations to get the standard deviation small enough for useful inference, the standard deviation of standard deviation is not a problem. There are other problems like the fact that your win rate is not constant nor independent from hand to hand that are much more serious.

If you want the formula, the variance of the variance is equal to the variance squared times [2/(n-1) + kurtosis/n], where n is the number of observations. That means, loosely speaking, the error in your standard deviation, expressed as a fraction of standard deviation, is on the order of 2/(n-1) + kurtosis/n. With 1,000 observations, the first term is 2/999, or a 0.2% error. The kurtosis is a measure of how "fat" the tails of the distribution are, it's 0 for a Normal and negative for a uniform distribution. Unless you play a crazy no-limit game in which one hand a night determines the entire outcome, your kurtosis is unlikely to be big enough to affect your standard deviation much after 1,000 hands.
#6
08-21-2005, 12:43 PM
 OrianasDaad Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 476
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

Fabulous, and exactly what I was looking for!

When you mentioned Gosset, I thought of the fellow who went mad attempting to crunch the number of different configurations for a bingo card ( C(15,5)^5? ). It doesn't appear to be him, however.
#7
08-21-2005, 06:09 PM
 AaronBrown Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: New York Posts: 505
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

I don't know him, but it sounds like an interesting story. I have a soft spot for mad mathematicians interested in gambling.
#8
08-21-2005, 07:48 PM
 mosdef Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Toronto Posts: 168
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

[ QUOTE ]
There are other problems like the fact that your win rate is not constant nor independent from hand to hand that are much more serious.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you think this is a serious problem because the player in question has a (hopefully) increasing skill level? or is is because the opponents stay fixed for a while and then change to a different set of opponents that stay fixed for a while, and so on.
#9
08-21-2005, 07:56 PM
 AaronBrown Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: New York Posts: 505
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

Both. Also, your win rate might go up or down with tiredness, type of players at the table, how much you're concentrating and so forth. Another problem is tilts, if you're prone to them then all standard-deviation bets are off.

There's a big difference between having a constant 1 BB per hour expected winrate, and having a winrate that varies randomly between -1 and +3, with an average of +1.
#10
08-21-2005, 08:30 PM
 mosdef Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Toronto Posts: 168
Re: Standard Deviation questions.

this is all true, however i am not convinced that you should toss all models where you assume serial independence of results. i would prefer the approach whereby you ask a question, answer it with the simplist available model, then decide if your answer would be altered significantly if you changed the model. since the random variables behind poker results are so complicated, it would be futile to try to overcome all the shortcomings in any model. i would take the line of trying to find the simplist model that will give you a good enough understanding of the situation at hand, whatever that may be.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Two Plus Two     Two Plus Two Internet Magazine     About the Forums     MOD DISCUSSION     ISOP General Poker Discussion     Texas Hold'em     Beginners Questions     Books and Publications     Televised Poker     News, Views, and Gossip     Brick and Mortar     Home Poker     Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance     Poker Theory Limit Texas Hold'em     Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em     Medium Stakes Hold'em     Small Stakes Hold'em     Micro-Limits     Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded     Small Stakes Shorthanded PL/NL Texas Hold'em     Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em     Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em     Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Poker     Multi-table Tournaments     One-table Tournaments Other Poker     Omaha/8     Omaha High     Stud     Other Poker Games General Gambling     Probability     Psychology     Sports Betting     Other Gambling Games     Rake Back     Computer Technical Help Internet Gambling     Internet Gambling     Internet Bonuses     Software 2+2 Communities     Other Other Topics Other Topics     Sporting Events     Politics     Science, Math, and Philosophy     The Stock Market

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.