Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2005, 05:48 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Stupid PF Question #570

10 handed game, it's playing very tight, but there's a maniac to your direct (Edit: right), so you're sticking around.

It's folded to a TAA in MP1 who raises.

Maniac folds, you're in MP3, the blinds are tight, and you have 99.

Do you re-raise?

(by TAA I mean something like 22-9-1.5)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2005, 05:49 AM
shant shant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 809
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

I think you mean the maniacs on your right.

Anyway, yes, 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2005, 05:51 AM
tyler_cracker tyler_cracker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

Yes. You have position, you're likely to isolate and buy the button, and the hand should be pretty easy to play after your 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2005, 06:28 AM
DeeJ DeeJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fold
Posts: 396
Default another stupid question

Who do the purple people represent (not the publishing red ones or the moderating green ones?)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2005, 06:36 AM
oreogod oreogod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irregular, Regular
Posts: 405
Default Re: another stupid question

[ QUOTE ]
Who do the purple people represent (not the publishing red ones or the moderating green ones?)

[/ QUOTE ]

People who go home and [censored] the prom queen.

To OP: 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2005, 06:40 AM
oreogod oreogod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irregular, Regular
Posts: 405
Default Re: another stupid question

Deej...heres why he gone purple.

Shants vic
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2005, 08:53 AM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,568
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

77 is closer.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2005, 08:56 AM
einbert einbert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in sklansky i trust
Posts: 2,190
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

Yes easy three-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2005, 09:31 AM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

especially with position on raiser, i will usually 3bet 99(like 99% of the time). and 88 88% and 77 77%, but TT gets tricky, b/c i do it 100% of the time 10 times and then 10 % once.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2005, 12:11 PM
rryjew rryjew is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: Stupid PF Question #570

[ QUOTE ]
Yes. You have position, you're likely to isolate and buy the button, and the hand should be pretty easy to play after your 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, I often have problems with this type of hand, so I guess I'm looking for a little more info. Say I 3-bet here and successfully buy the button.

How do you play a flop with one or more overcards and villian bets?

No overcards and villian bets?

One or more overcards and villian check raises?

Finally, no overcards villian check raises?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.