Anyone else hate PokerStars ring games?

[fire_fly]

multitabling 1/2 for first time here. BLOWS.

4 tabled for about an hour and a half while trying to clear a 120 bonus, and the highest table vpip I saw was 28.

Software lags hugely, especially when running PAHud.

Horrible tables, annoying to look at software which runs slow also.

Never though I'd say this, but I LOVE party's simple software compared to this crap...

[MrWookie47]

You can skin Stars. There was a micro thread I lost that covered this.

Also, consider putting this stuff either in the Zoo, or the NC thread.

[shadow29]

YES!!!!!

EFFERS AT .02/.04 cleaned my CLOCK after 30 MINUTES with beat AFTER beat AFTER beat!!!111111111!!

RIVERSTARS SUCKS!!!!!!!111111111!!!!!!!one!!!

[Andrew Smith]

The games are tighter than Party, that's for sure. But players are nearly as bad postflop. From what I've seen, it's still an extremely passive game. And I have always thought Poker Stars has the best software of any site... hmm.

[kapw7]

I know I've said that a few thousand times before but try the 6-max tables. I've only played 2/4 SH where the competition is worse than Party so I imagine the 1/2 will be even better.

And the rake is much less.

[Eeegah]

[ QUOTE ]
Software lags hugely, especially when running PAHud.

Horrible tables, annoying to look at software which runs slow also.

Never though I'd say this, but I LOVE party's simple software compared to this crap...

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm trying to figure out what site you have confused for Stars.

[oreogod]

[ QUOTE ]
The games are tighter than Party, that's for sure. But players are nearly as bad postflop. From what I've seen, it's still an extremely passive game. And I have always thought Poker Stars has the best software of any site... hmm.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol, Im doing a b-roll project with my brother...building him a bankroll basically from nothing (.95 cents actually...up to 520.15 so far) -- anyway, tight or not, most of these players suck.

I cant stand Party's software. So to each his own I guess.