Killing a non-P'tracker site vs. switching sites to record your stats

[imported_metrognome7]

Need a few informed opinions to help in my decision:

I'm currently playing the low/micro NL tables on a certain site to a pretty nice return - usually 10-25 BBs/100 hands. I've also maintained a steady ROI of around 50% w/ an ITM of 75% on the lowest-level SnG's. I enjoy the software there, the customer service is prompt and courteous, and my bonuses are starting to kick in; however...

This site doesn't support PokerTracker.

I would REALLY like to begin putting together a comprehensive statistical analysis of my play so that I can take that next step up, and in order to do that it looks like I'm going to have to DL PokerTracker and switch to a different site.

My question is this:
In my situation would you continue playnig primarily where I am now and not worry about PokerTracker, or would you switch your primary action to Party/Stars in order to start tracking?

Thanks in advance,
Adam

[TheHammer24]

Well, PT is priceless, however, it seems that you are playing at such a low level that analysis might not be necessary. Do what you want. BTW, Party does not have limits lower that .50/1

[imported_metrognome7]

[ QUOTE ]
Well, PT is priceless, however, it seems that you are playing at such a low level that analysis might not be necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point. I want, though, to begin climbing up the ladder to the point where stats do matter, it's just a question of how early I need to make the investment.

[ QUOTE ]
BTW, Party does not have limits lower that .50/1

[/ QUOTE ]

Right now I'm playing .25/.50 to the previously mentioned stats and have been considering jumping up anyway, so this wouldn't be too much of a problem. Thanks for the heads-up though!

Adam

[Art Vandelay]

Do what you like I just want to say that's a sweet icon you have there.

[playersare]

[ QUOTE ]
Party does not have limits lower that .50/1

[/ QUOTE ]
the OP is playing micro NL. blinds at the Party $25 tables are 10c/25c.

[MaxPowerPoker]

This thread at the PokerTracker forum just might be relevant.

Just a hunch. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

http://www.pokertracker.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6469

[imported_metrognome7]

B*tchin'. Thanks Max.

[TheNoodleMan]

[ QUOTE ]


I'm currently playing the low/micro NL tables on a certain site to a pretty nice return - usually 10-25 BBs/100 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]
something tells me that when he gets some PT compatability that these numbers will turn out to be a gross overestimation.

[krimson]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I'm currently playing the low/micro NL tables on a certain site to a pretty nice return - usually 10-25 BBs/100 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]
something tells me that when he gets some PT compatability that these numbers will turn out to be a gross overestimation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, he also claims to have a 50% ROI on s/n/g's. If only this were possible.

[imported_metrognome7]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm currently playing the low/micro NL tables on a certain site to a pretty nice return - usually 10-25 BBs/100 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]
something tells me that when he gets some PT compatability that these numbers will turn out to be a gross overestimation.

[/ QUOTE ]
The BB rate may be an overestimation, yes, but if it is it's not too far off - typically if I buy in for $25 at a .10/.25 I leave with at least $30 after one hour. An occasional downswing accounts for placing the bottom end of the BB rate at 10per100.

[ QUOTE ]

Yep, he also claims to have a 50% ROI on s/n/g's. If only this were possible.

[/ QUOTE ]
As for my SnG ROI... perhaps I'm miscalculating, but isn't ROI calculated as (Winnings - EntryFees)/EntryFees? If that's the case, then for yesterday alone my ROI was approximately 45%:
($81-$33)/$33 = 1.45, an ROI of 45% correct?

Yes, then, in my original post I overstated my ROI, though given a little numbers crunching for the past few weeks I'd be confident in saying it is a solid 35-40%. If I am miscalculating I'd greatly appreciate a quick tutorial on the proper calculations.