#1
|
|||
|
|||
problem with NL
200 NL
I have 150$ and villian got me coverd. I sit on the button with T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], CO limps in, so do I. Pot 3,5BB Flop Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 checks, CO bets 7$, I raise to 30, everyone folds and CO moves all-in, what do I do?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
[ QUOTE ]
200 NL I have 150$ and villian got me coverd. I sit on the button with T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], CO limps in, so do I. Pot 3,5BB Flop Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3 checks, CO bets 7$, I raise to 30, everyone folds and CO moves all-in, what do I do?? [/ QUOTE ] Call. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
Can someone explain the math behind this hand, I really need to learn it.
However I think its pretty close, leaning towards a fold. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
The math is you are ~55% to make your hand. Call. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
count every out that makes you a straight & a flush. divide by the number of remain unseen cards & repeat for the turn. then you either multiply or add the two remaining numbers (you decide).
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
Easiest call in history. You are 40-60 if he got QQ or AK of [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. So you have the correct odds to call even if you can put him on exactly QQ.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
OK I've run the numbers.
He has 7 ways to be on a Ace high flush draw (assuming he would limp with any Axs pre-flop on the CO except for AK which he would have raised). AQ,AJ,AT and A9 are accounted for already. You are 40:60 dog to A8s and 45:55 dog to the others. Let's again discount QQ as he would raise pre-flop. So he has 6 ways to hit set of 9's or 6's. If he has a set you are 42:58 dog. Let's assign 10% to a big fat bluff - but you need to hit too and are probably only 60/40 vs that. So overall you are a marginal dog - about 44/56 probably. You are calling c$120 to win a $300 pot - trivial call I think.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
If we make the assumption that he'll only play back at you like this with a set, then you have 42.1% equity in the pot.
a b c d 303$ * 0.390 - 118$ = 9.5$ a = total pot size if you call b = your chance of winning the pot if you call c = how much it cost you to call d = net EV (call) If he holds the worst case scenario holding Ah8h it would turn into a roughly zero EV call. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
{First time using pokerstove, so please correct me if I did this wrong.}
Assign a range of hands to the villain and use pokerstove to figure out your chance of winning. Let's say he has a draw to the nut flush, a set, or two pair. I'm not including AK or QQ since he limped: 15,840 games 0.015 secs 1,056,000 games/sec Board: Qh 9h 6d Dead: equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 44.5581 % 44.56% 00.00% { JhTh } Hand 2: 55.4419 % 55.44% 00.00% { 99, 66, Ah8h, Ah7h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, Qc9c, Qc6c, 9c6c } So we're about a 1.2:1 underdog to the river. The pot is laying you 1.4:1 on your call. So a call is correct here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: problem with NL
I was initially going to say clear fold, as you're behind most hands that would play like this (set, higher flush), and just ahead (55%) of one or two pair. Your pot odds are only 164:118, or 1.39:1. But I changed my mind after looking at how close it is. The two straight flush outs add a few percent in redraws against sets and greatly improve your odds against a higher flush.
Set: Jh Th 42.12 6s 6c 57.88 Higher flush: Jh Th 43.94 Ah 6h 56.06 Jh Th 39.90 Ah Kh 60.10 (unlikely with no pfr) One pair: Jh Th 56.77 As Qc 43.23 Jh Th 52.63 Ac Ah 47.37 Two pair Jh Th 51.21 9s Qc 48.79 So I think this is a marginal call, given the action in this hand. It's +EV, but marginal because it's only a small +EV, and has very high variance. Personally I wouldn't call this against a decent player as a higher flush draw or set is almost certain. If the hand was Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (i.e. OESFD but no straight flush outs), I don't think I'd call this. Jh Th 35.15 Ah 9h 64.85 Jh Th 40.30 6c 6d 59.70 Poker Odds Calculator |
|
|