|
|
|
|
#1
06-24-2005, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
UB 50-100, I'm slightly underrolled for this game but a brutal LAGgy-maniac has me taking a shot.
Maniac raises/3-bets 75% of his hands preflop and follows through all the way (when checked to). he's already reloaded. 9-handed. I get AJo and open raise UTG, as usual maniac 3-bets and its heads up to the flop. yes i missed an easy cap here. 2 to the flop ($375) J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I check-raise. 2 to the turn ($575) (J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]) K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] I check-raise. (Is bet-3-bet a better line?) 2 to the river ($975) (J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]) 8 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] I check-raise and he calls. Now, is this guy gonna stick around and continue to hand away his money or will this wise him up a bit? 
|
|
#5
06-24-2005, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
[ QUOTE ]
i don't think you missed an easy cap preflop.. unless he is just TOTALLY CRAZY. [/ QUOTE ] He raises/3-bets 75% of his hands preflop. It's just a cap for value.
|
|
#6
06-25-2005, 05:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i don't think you missed an easy cap preflop.. unless he is just TOTALLY CRAZY. [/ QUOTE ] He raises/3-bets 75% of his hands preflop. It's just a cap for value. [/ QUOTE ] bingo.
|
|
#7
06-24-2005, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
I think, in general, it's a mistake to play in a game with a maniac when your under-rolled, as each pot will be expensive both because of him and, more importantly, because the others know he's a maniac. For example, in this hand, you can really be in an unenviable spot if somebody has a hand behind him and 4-bets pre-flop. I also think it can be a mistake to check-raise him excessively lest he clam up. And, from purely a $ point of view, betting out might sometimes allow you to 3-bet some street(s), for example, the turn when a high card flush-draw producing card comes.
But if the guy will bet every time you check to him, it's hard to resist the temptation to go for the check-raise when a card he sees as a "scare" card comes.
|
|
#8
06-25-2005, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
I think, in general, it's a mistake to play in a game with a maniac when your under-rolled, as each pot will be expensive both because of him and, more importantly, because the others know he's a maniac.
I'm taking a shot and don't intend to play in this game for any significant length of time until my roll is more sizeable.
|
|
#10
06-24-2005, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB 50-100: First Trifecta and I think it was a mistake
Exactly how is this an easy cap???? Yes, you have the best hand in all liklihood...but you're going to have to go to showdown with this guy, no? You have almost zero fold equity if you describe this guy correctly. It is highly doubtful that you're more than a 3 to 2 favorite regardless of his holding. The only hands you dominate are Ax and Jx at which you're a good, but not great favorite. At times you're even going to be a coinflip underdog. And yes, you could be dominated yourself since even LAGs pick up good hands. So, you're either a 3:2 favorite, essentially 1:1, or you're a 3:2 dog (and possibly even worse).
Add to all of this that you're not going to have any idea where you're at if you don't hit the flop. Are you afraid of giving him control by letting him put in the last raise before the flop? He's gonna bet/raise the flop no matter what. If you cap it off, what's you're play if you whiff and have no draw but overcards? Call down with Ace high? Play it for the best hand? The way you describe him, he's not folding if he has any shot whatsoever of winning the pot. Just one of the problems that LAGs cause. Another is higher variance. You don't want that if your short on roll for this game.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
