Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-23-2005, 08:12 PM
Ray Of Light Ray Of Light is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 17
Default Do you need to be a Gamblerholic to be Great?


I am refering to profitable poker players who regularly play in the really large games, like 500/1000 and above, who are playing for such slight profit edges, against the very best competition, day in day out.

With the willingness to put in time and effort, most poker players can become good poker players. Basic math, game theory knowledge and discipline will see you make money in the long run at the low to mid limit levels. But what is it that differentiates a typically good poker player, from a great poker player?

One thing I have noticed about the very best High Limit poker players, is that they seem to be gamblerholics (please note that this is a generalisation, and I am most likely very wrong in my assumption).

In various interviews, Daniel Negreanu and Jennifer Harmon have often spoken about how they would regularly play way above their bankrolls early in their professional poker careers, Phil Ivey admits that he is not very good with money and whatever money he has 'if he has it he will gamble with it', Johnny Chan has been interviewed speaking about how for the first couple of years that he played poker he was a steady big money loser, regularly dropping 2k a night (money he could not afford). Doyle Brunson has said that to play big money poker, the money you are betting with has to mean absolutely nothing to you, otherwise you will freeze up in the middle of a hand. And we all know about Stu Ungar's attraction to prop bet on anything, often gambling way more than he could afford. Even legendary poker players like Nick The Greek, who won and lost millions during his lifetime, was left almost pennyless by the end of it.

It seems to me that to be a GREAT poker player, basic math, theory and discipline simply aren't enough. You need to have some serious gamble in you to make the money consistantly in those big bet games. The edge you have in those games simply isn't enough for you to just sit back and wait for good cards.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-23-2005, 08:23 PM
Mike Cuneo Mike Cuneo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Steeler Country
Posts: 209
Default Re: Do you need to be a Gamblerholic to be Great?

I bet you $10k you're wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2005, 08:53 PM
geormiet geormiet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Default Re: Do you need to be a Gamblerholic to be Great?

Sure it's a good point. Once you are playing at a certain level, the competition is so fearsome that the greatest edge you can have is small. If you're not actively enjoying yourself in simply playing the game, and playing just for the money making potential, you will probably go nuts.

In the middle limits it's different because you can play against weak players, and get satsfaction out of just earning dollars.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-23-2005, 08:54 PM
EStreet20 EStreet20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 109
Default Re: Do you need to be a Gamblerholic to be Great?

[ QUOTE ]
I bet you $10k you're wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he's right I'll give you double or nothing that it rains tommorrow in Scranton, PA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.