#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big blind defense in pots with a posted blind
If there is another big blind posted around the table, my default play is that if there is a raise from someone else and folded in-between to me (including the poster), meaning that I close the action with a call and go headsup to the flop, my default play has become to call with excactly any two in that spot.
Right or no? lars |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big blind defense in pots with a posted blind
Please explain better. What position are you in, BB? What position is the raiser? Where is the poster?
Nevermind, it's never correct to call with any two? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big blind defense in pots with a posted blind
get peter_rus on it
seems right though. The extra smallbet pretty much makes it worth with any two heads up. Maybe if you weed out offsuit four+ gappers with highcard J or worse against UTG and UTG+1 raises from solid players your about there. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Big blind defense in pots with a posted blind
a few notes:
-first off, there is a difference between the poster raising and you calling hu getting 3.5:1 and the hijack raising and you calling getting 4.5:1. -theres a huge difference between EP, MP, and LP raises under these circumstances and your calling range even though yoou're getting the same 4.5:1 -all else equal an opponents skill matters and should affect the range as well. -the only time i would come close to playing any 2 is when the poster checks button raises and poster prematurely mucks. -when the button raises the poster is still to act and that affects the range imo. -Barron |
|
|