#1
|
|||
|
|||
QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
What ever happened to the hand history pairings? There was so much interest but no results?
Anyway, I swapped some HHs' with Berge20, and he suggest posting this hand which Im unhappy with. Any comments welcome Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (10 handed) converter UTG+1 ($94) UTG+2 ($84.05) MP1 ($63.55) MP2 ($88.95) MP3 ($15.5) CO ($118.67) Button ($129.4) SB ($100.2) Hero ($104.4) UTG ($100) Preflop: Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.5. UTG posts a blind of $1. UTG (poster) checks, UTG+1 calls $1, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP3 calls $1, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB (poster) completes, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $6</font>, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $6, MP3 calls $14.50 (All-In), SB calls $14.50, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $23</font>, UTG+1 folds, SB calls $8.50. Flop: ($71.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $40</font>. Final Pot: $111.50 Yuck!! thanks, Ojo_Rojo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
Minraising after MP3 limp/reraised all-in and SB called?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
What would you reraise to? Around $50?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
You haven't mentioned any reads on players but I imagine SB is pretty awful? He has a hand that he just completes with in the SB, but then has no problem calling after you raise and MP3 pushes, then calling again after you reraise. There are roughly zero hands a good player would play this way. What range would he do this with? Some sort of medium pair? Is this possibly an extremely passive AK? Against some players, I'd expect to see a small pair and, against others (the ones who view AK as a drawing hand), I'd expect AK more.
In any case, if you want to reraise after the all-in, I think you need to make it an amount where you can just shove it in no matter what flops. If you make it $50, your other $50 goes in on the flop no matter what and, if he didn't have AA, KK, or AK, you make Sklansky bucks regardless. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
I'd fold preflop to MP3's limp/reraise all-in. Weak?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
Push after SB calls MP3's all-in.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
When you put in the third raise, instead of min-re-re-raising, just go all in. I'm serious.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ - 100 NL Full ring (+HH pairings)
[ QUOTE ]
Push after SB calls MP3's all-in. [/ QUOTE ] This is probably my move. The lrr guy probably has AK or a low/mid PP. I am very happy going HU against him. Get everyone else out. Also, Amoeba and I exchanged hands and it went very well. We exchanged 200. That was probably a good idea to get used to the other person's play, but it took a long time to go over so I think our next installment will only be 100. |
|
|