Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2005, 12:00 PM
Padawan Learner Padawan Learner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Default AKs.....big pot with no help

Online 3/6 game.

UTG (super loose passive who calls way too much) limps, MP1 (only a 6 or 7 hands with MP1, and he has raised 3 or 4 times preflop already....and either folded post flop or won without a showdown), Unknown MP2 cold calls, folded to me in the sb with A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] and I 3 bet. UTG, MP1 and MP2 all call.

Pot is 13 sb with 4 players. Flop is 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
I lead, and all 3 call.

8.5 BB in the pot and the turn is 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Am I ever ahead here---if so how often? How often do you suspect I get raised on that board given the action and my (minimal) reads? Do I lead the turn or check call 1 bet?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2005, 12:11 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

I'm not sure I like leading again here with little-to-zero outs again 3 virtually unkown players. If it's checked around to the last-to-act and he bets I may think about check raising.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2005, 12:26 PM
Padawan Learner Padawan Learner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

Crunchy:

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure I like leading again here with little-to-zero outs

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't think my ace and k outs, on that board, are going to be good the majority of the time?

Also, I take it that you think I am ahead here almost never?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:09 PM
shark6 shark6 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

The flop missed you completely and the pot is big. Nobody is folding any remotely caught piece of the flop for 1 SB. I’d checkraise a LP bettor to get people out and improve your chances of winning, or just call a EP bettor.

By leading, you risk getting raised or trapped for many bets on the flop when you are behind and drawing to a 1-pair type hand that maybe is even reverse-dominated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:13 PM
Sinnister Sinnister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 335
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

You want to lead with 2 ppl or less. with 3 or more check and take one off, fold the turn if UI. Super loose game ur semis lose value so maybe u wont even wanna lead out maybe just check and call fold the turn, but thats a little weak 4 my taste.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:15 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

[ QUOTE ]
You don't think my ace and k outs, on that board, are going to be good the majority of the time?

[/ QUOTE ]
No, I think they will be good a decent percentage of the time. But that's not a reason to lead again on the turn - it's a reason to call one bet on the turn if you're getting good odds on your money.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I take it that you think I am ahead here almost never?

[/ QUOTE ]
Again, I think you're probably ahead here a fair amount of the time - but, again, that doesn't neccessarily mean that you should be betting. Personally against three opponents (w/a PFR and cold-caller) I'd expect to see a medium PP).

I feel like I really want to see the river but I want to do it for one bet. Leading the turn really opens yourself up to a couple bad situations that I wouldn't want to be in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:17 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

FWIW - I'm leading the flop after 3-betting with no cap 100% of the time.

I think the posters advocating check/calling this rainbow, rag flop are playing super weak/tight poker.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:17 PM
Padawan Learner Padawan Learner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

shark:

[ QUOTE ]
The flop missed you completely and the pot is big. Nobody is folding any remotely caught piece of the flop for 1 SB. I’d checkraise a LP bettor to get people out and improve your chances of winning, or just call a EP bettor

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I would be more apt to take your line on a more threatening/ugly board for my hand; but this board is pretty benign. I don't think it is a stretch at all to think I am best quite often on the flop and there is no guarantee the flop will get bet if I checked.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:25 PM
Sinnister Sinnister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 335
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW - I'm leading the flop after 3-betting with no cap 100% of the time.

I think the posters advocating check/calling this rainbow, rag flop are playing super weak/tight poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

In a very loose game ur leading bet is getting raised with any pp. It should be an option in your thinking though i would lead most of the time as well u shouldnt be closed in your thinking
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:34 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: AKs.....big pot with no help

[ QUOTE ]
In a very loose game ur leading bet is getting raised with any pp. It should be an option in your thinking though i would lead most of the time as well u shouldnt be closed in your thinking

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm assuming you meant in an "aggressive" game my lead would get raised - "loose" has nothing to do with it (tight/loose are not equivilant to passive/aggressive)

I'm not closed minded at all. I'm commenting on the specific situation posted in this thread which describes the players as loose/passive except for MP1. Incidentally, MP1 is described as one who seems to raise a lot PF - but is also capable of folding hands he raised PF after the flop to aggression.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.