Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:52 PM
JKDStudent JKDStudent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 134
Default Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, CO calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, CO calls.

Flop: (10.50 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
BB checks, MP2 checks, MP3 checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, CO folds.

Turn: (6.75 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
MP2 checks, MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls.

River: (9.75 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
MP2 checks, MP3 checks, Hero checks.

Final Pot: 9.75 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
MP2 has 8s Td (two pair, tens and eights).
MP3 has Ac 8c (one pair, eights).
Hero has Jh Jc (three of a kind, jacks).
Outcome: Hero wins 9.75 BB. </font>

With a third diamond falling and a board that gives anyone with a nine a straight, I checked behind and took the free showdown. Basically, I was afraid that someone that made something would check since I had been betting the whole time, looking for a raise. I had no reads on these players as we were all pretty new to the table, but given the way they were calling down, I wasn't ruling anything out.

So... was this weak/scared? How bad? And yell at me to make sure I don't do it again.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:56 PM
Kumubou Kumubou is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PWND harder than that^^ :(
Posts: 425
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

I would fire again on this river. I am not at all concerned about the backdoor flush; if someone hit that, shrug. The gutshot 4-straight would make me a little skittish, but you will get called here by many worse hands. Then again, you might have someone with a naked 9 just call it (oh well).

Posting results is bad, mmmkay?

-K
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:57 PM
Firefly Firefly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 73
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

Bet the river
The diamond itself doesn't scare me, it came backdoor remember.
I'd have a hard time giving credit for a 9 here, and most people will pay you off with second best hands, so bet the river
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:57 PM
ClaytonN ClaytonN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,630
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

Yes, they could call you on the river with some kind of flush or straight. They could even checkraise you.

But the likelyhood of this happening when you bet is less than the chance someone calls you down with two pair, TPWK, or some other kinda crap hand that is second best to the three jacks.

This is "value betting". Learn to do it, and you'll make more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2005, 02:59 PM
KaiShin KaiShin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thanks for all the fish
Posts: 1,195
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

Yes, it was a missed value bet.

Also, try not to post the results of the hand. It will ensure that feedback is not influenced by how the hand turned out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-10-2005, 03:17 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 197
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

All other comments aside (I haven't read them), yes this is pretty bad.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-10-2005, 03:38 PM
imported_The Vibesman imported_The Vibesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smokin\' With Bacall
Posts: 895
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

I think you need to bet here. I didn't read the results, but this seems like a value bet. If someone backdoored a flush or straight, oh well. It doesn't happen every time the cards are on the board.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:16 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

definitely bet the river.

suh weet table bro
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:24 PM
AmarilloJim1 AmarilloJim1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Check....Raise
Posts: 304
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

[ QUOTE ]
Definitely bet the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:24 PM
teajay teajay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 56
Default Re: Checking behind w/ set o\' jacks on river. Too weak?

I'm firing chips in with both hands here. Clear value bet. You're getting called here way too often by weak hands to not bet.

Note: I found once I was able to constantly value bet that I won a lot more. Those extra 2BB add up mighty quick.

Travis
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.