![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of my leaks is that I tend to overvalue big pocket pairs.
In this hand I feel I would be behind most of the time to at least one of the villains (if not both) and in a coin flip with the other at best. Yes? No? Powered by UltimateBet Started at 05/Jun/05 23:32:25 UTG is at seat 0 with $25.55. UTG+1 is at seat 1 with $96.50. MP is at seat 2 with $36.05. MP+1 is at seat 3 with $39.50. LP is at seat 4 with $141.75. HERO is at seat 5 with $46.10. CO is at seat 6 with $36.50. SB is at seat 8 with $100.65. BB is at seat 9 with $88.55. The button is at seat 7. SB posts the small blind of $.50. BB posts the big blind of $1. Hero: Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Pre-flop: 1 fold. UTG+1 calls. MP raises to $4.50. 2 folds. Hero calls. 2 folds. SB re-raises to $26. 1 fold. MP goes all-in for $36.05. Hero folds. SB calls. My plan with the flat call of the first raise was to push any flop w/o an Ace or King. If I had reraised the original raiser, say, make it $15 to go, that would have been about 1/3 my stack and would have made it very hard to lay down to either of the re-raises. Comments? regards, Tim (ps- I'm almost certain that if this hand happend on Party I would call in a second) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like it. No need to pot commit yourself preflop when you have position on the original raiser, and an easy laydown after the all-ins. nh.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() bump |
![]() |
|
|