Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:28 PM
mister mister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 217
Default QTs

Where are you playing this hand preflop in a 10 handed game. What's the first position you'd considering playing it in ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:31 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: QTs

UTG.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:41 PM
mister mister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: QTs

you call with it UTG ? seriously ? that's a lot loser then I'd ever play (not sure if you're joking)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:43 PM
Piiop Piiop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 77
Default Re: QTs

UTG.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:43 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: QTs

This isn't as interesting as the next one

Now this is really interesting!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:45 PM
ncboiler ncboiler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 202
Default Re: QTs

Any position...call.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:47 PM
mister mister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: QTs

wow I guess I've been misplaying this. I never really saw a point to playing a multiway hand in early position when you can't really know if you're going to get enough callers to make it worthwhile. Not to mention I don't like calling UTG very much.

hmm I need to get more opinions on this, it goes against most of what I've read
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:47 PM
Moesendreck Moesendreck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 26
Default Re: QTs

MP, one caller ahead of me, I'll limp in when expectancy of a raise behind is relatively low. If game can become too aggro, I'll kill QTs in that spot and raise the limper count to 2 before calling.

Basically it's depending on the type of game you're in. At rather loose Party low limit typical kinda game, limp from EP also... should be good enough plenty times.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-01-2005, 08:51 PM
ncboiler ncboiler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 202
Default Re: QTs

[ QUOTE ]


hmm I need to get more opinions on this, it goes against most of what I've read

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you read SSH?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-01-2005, 09:00 PM
mister mister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: QTs

I read a sklansky limit book, saw all the tables. I just recalled QTs being too weak to play early in a semi aggressive game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.