Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2005, 11:13 AM
PokerCat69 PokerCat69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
Default NO set no bet - good or bad

With small pocket pairs (22-66), I generally limp with 3 callers minimum and check/fold if I missed.
Is that long term +EV or not? I don't have enough stats yet to determine if this play is worthwhile.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2005, 11:26 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

It depends.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2005, 01:01 PM
txdolly txdolly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

Works for NL/ Limit it depends
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2005, 01:17 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

[ QUOTE ]
It depends.

[/ QUOTE ]

That post is an excellent one, but tough to digest. Don't expect to understand it without spending some serious thinking time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2005, 02:17 PM
gvibes gvibes is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

Would you check/fold the following hand? That would be a bad idea. (By the way, I think my river play is questionable.)

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG calls, MP calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: (4 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG folds, MP calls, SB calls.

Turn: (5 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP calls, SB folds.

River: (7 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP folds.

Final Pot: 7 BB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2005, 02:20 PM
gildwulf gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 3/6 six-max and $20-50 SNGs
Posts: 846
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

If it's folded to me I bet, otherwise I get out.

zf
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2005, 02:27 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: NO set no bet - good or bad

that was a great thread. I have since really made a lot more money off my smaller pairs. There are lots of situations where they are the best hand after the flop, against pfr, who if played right we can get them to fold incorrectly, or, no overs come on the turn and river and win a nice pot.

also, I don't think you ever followed thru on your plan to post a hand like that with a different user name, just to throw everyone off. (or have you)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.