Att to steal blinds poll

[Silverback]

Normally my att to steal blinds % is around 38-39.
I think the blinds should be given a hard time in 6 max.

However I then moved up limits, and immediatley felt I had to tighten up and in particular the att to steal blinds, why? Firstly the blinds were less, sb was 2/5 of bet and not 1/2, secondly my bankroll is spread bonuswhoring so Id rather not risk losing as much, prefer to start new limit more solid against better players.

So, what is your own att to steal blind %, only answer the poll if you are very happy with your att to steal blind, and feel no reason to increase or decrease it, Thanks

Assume sb 1/2 a bet

[Silverback]

More posters than I imagined are in the 40% region,

Does this result in higher bb/100 win for CO and button positions?

I think the averages for those from a past poll were:
CO: 0.11
button: 0.14

So who steals blinds 37+ and has better winrate in those positions?

[TStoneMBD]

my stats look like this:
BT
1
2
3
4
5
BB
SB


why do i have 8 different stats? keep in mind i have a filter set in preferences to only display 5/10 6max, so i dont know what this is about.

[Lmn55d]

I think there was a problem with party and pokertracker where the seats were numbered incorrectly after a partypoker update. Pokertracker fixed this problem but instructed users to reimport the hands from this time period. I think this is probably what it is (I have same thing). Just ignore seats 4 and 5.

[TStoneMBD]

i cant just ignore seats 4 and 5 because they comprise of over 1/4 of my total earnings, almost 1/3. my button stat and co stat are only .11 and .08 respectively, but they should go up significantly if there wasnt this error.

[Nick Royale]

Donk question:
What is considered as a blind steal according to PT?

[naphand]

This poll does not contain a representative sample, you need a lot more people to respond. My guess is most HUSH readers are stealing in the region of 25-30%, just based on the kind of posts made over the last few months.

It is also very opponent, hence game, dependent. Averages don't mean much.

[Silverback]

[ QUOTE ]


It is also very opponent, hence game, dependent. Averages don't mean much

[/ QUOTE ]

That is very obvious, but over a few thousand hands it will become apparant if a blind steal is between 1 of teh ranges I highlighted.

Jeess, most hands are game player dependant,

[Catt]

I'm in the 35% range in the 2/5 blind structure.

[ QUOTE ]
. . . secondly my bankroll is spread bonuswhoring so Id rather not risk losing as much, prefer to start new limit more solid against better players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand this at all. 1. Your bankroll is your bankroll, whether or not it is sitting in your bank, Neteller, one site, or multiple sites. 2. Failing to play your normal aggressive game out of a desire to "not risk losing as much" is a recipe for losing / not doing as well as you otherwise would. 3. Failing to play your normal aggressive game is the opposite of playing "solid" against better opponents.

[Silverback]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand this at all. 1. Your bankroll is your bankroll, whether or not it is sitting in your bank, Neteller, one site, or multiple sites. 2. Failing to play your normal aggressive game out of a desire to "not risk losing as much" is a recipe for losing / not doing as well as you otherwise would. 3. Failing to play your normal aggressive game is the opposite of playing "solid" against better opponents.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Ive only got $200 in an account I cant really sit in at a $5/$10 game, plus I dont want to move up limits until Im real confident in my play,

I think the fact I was at a higher limit made me question, was I actually to loose in my blind stealing, I think 40% maybe to loose as from the CO you still have half the table to act after you, and from button obviously 1/3 of table to act after you,