People At Table Critized. What Do You Think?

[Sactodian]

EMPIRE POKER No-Limit Hold'em, 25 (6 handed) converter

BB vs UTG+2, BB has UTG+2 Covered All In


Preflop: Hero is BB with 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.25. UTG+2 calls.
Flop: (.5) 5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img],3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img],Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 players)
<font color="red"> UTG+2 Raises $1, Hero Raises $2, UTG+2 Raises All-In ($10.35) </font> , Hero Calls.

Turn: (21.2) K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 players)


River: ($21.2) 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 players, 1 all-in)

Final Pot: $21.2

Results in white below:
<font color="white">3 3(Three Of A Kind, Threes).
Hero has 6s 4s (straight, seven high).
Outcome: Hero wins $21.2. </font>

[theredpill5]

Hell yeah !! I'm ALL IN !!!! Sweet. Nice one. Although, technically, you are 40 % to win that from the flop because of his redraws but you can't know that he has a set. Given that it was only $8 more to call for you , it appears that you were getting correct odds to call even if he did have a set. You need 3 to 2 odds, btw only because you are all-in and no future betting takes place.

[swolfe]

standard, although your flop raise should have been bigger

also, i hope you didn't try to tell people about "the odds when the money went in". don't educate the fish cause this is one of the most profitable plays against them.

[subzero]

It looks like you were getting the correct odds. It's hard to put him on a set and you have so many outs. If I was at your table, I wouldn't have criticized you. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[subzero]

[ QUOTE ]
also, i hope you didn't try to tell people about "the odds when the money went in". don't educate the fish cause this is one of the most profitable plays against them.

[/ QUOTE ]
Good point. If someone makes a bad call and draws out on me, I just say "nh" (even though I know it wasn't). Positive reinforcement!

[pzhon]

Your check-raise should have been larger. You don't want to price someone in since you are out of position.

After the hand, say you flopped the straight.

[kongo_totte]

[ QUOTE ]
Your check-raise should have been larger. You don't want to price someone in.

After the hand, say you flopped the straight.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right. The beauty of an OESD+FD is you can combine folding equity w/ a great chance of drawing out. That flop min.raise has slim to non folding equity. Make a big raise to like $7-8, committing you both. The reason I don't like re-raising all in is it's quite obvious your on a big draw. Play it like you would a set combined w/ getting maximum folding equity.

[swolfe]

[ QUOTE ]
The reason I don't like re-raising all in is it's quite obvious your on a big draw. Play it like you would a set combined w/ getting maximum folding equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd reraise all-in with a set too.

actually, it looks like hero led off with a minbet that villain minraised and hero min-reraised. i hate this hand now. play it like you have some balls.

[kongo_totte]

[ QUOTE ]

i'd reraise all-in with a set too.


[/ QUOTE ]

Well, in that case, just push.

Against bad players, which is a random player at this level, I'm not re-raising all in w/ a set. I might against good players though. Against a bad player, pot commit him and he won't even notice it.

[excession]

My only concern would by that he is pushing a higher flush draw so that half my outs are dead.