How bad did I do with AA here?

gorie · #1 04-25-2005, 03:59 AM

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $0.5.
1 fold, UTG+1 calls, 1 fold, Hero raises, 2 folds, CO (poster) calls, 1 fold, SB calls, BB calls, UTG+1 calls.

Flop: (10 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (5 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG+1 bets, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, SB calls, BB folds, UTG+1 caps, Hero calls, CO calls, SB calls.

Turn: (13 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 players)
SB checks, UTG+1 bets, Hero calls, CO raises, SB calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls.

River: (21 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 players)
SB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero checks, CO bets, SB calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 25 BB

All were loose players, SB and UTG+1 were pretty passive also. not much of a read other than that.

With all the action on the flop and so many people in, I started to get nervous and slowed down on the turn. Possible straight on the board, flush draw, and with all the betting I thought someone must have 2 pair or a set.! But I also feel wimpy to have slow down so much, since I know I am usually too passive post-flop.

How would you have played this?

milesdyson · #2 04-25-2005, 04:02 AM

Don't post results, and change your reads on those lags.

GrandmaStabone · #3 04-25-2005, 04:04 AM

Raise, raise and raise.

gorie · #4 04-25-2005, 04:05 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Don't post results, and change your reads on those lags.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ok sorry, I thought putting it in white was the thing to do.
Not sure what you mean by "change your reads on those lags" ? can you explain?

cmwck · #5 04-25-2005, 04:06 AM

Don't really see what you could have done differently.
You're not folding this hand, thats for sure.

milesdyson · #6 04-25-2005, 04:06 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Don't post results, and change your reads on those lags.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ok sorry, I thought putting it in white was the thing to do.
Not sure what you mean by "change your reads on those lags" ? can you explain?

[/ QUOTE ]
I looked at the results and concluded that you should no longer consider them passive.

Putting your results in white only means I have to select the text to read them.

cmwck · #7 04-25-2005, 04:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Don't post results, and change your reads on those lags.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ok sorry, I thought putting it in white was the thing to do.
Not sure what you mean by "change your reads on those lags" ? can you explain?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he means mark them as loose aggressive players.

gorie · #8 04-25-2005, 04:09 AM

gotcha.!
Just so you know I was just going by the default rules in pokertracker which showed as Loose-Passive/Passive. Obviously they didn't play so passive here, but wouldn't my read up until that point remain the same for the purpose of the thread? I don't know.
not sure if you meant to make note of it for myself, or change it on my original post.

MrEngenic · #9 04-25-2005, 05:39 AM

You could raise the turn and fold if it comes back capped since you will likely have to pay 6 more BB to see a showdown here.

cmwck · #10 04-25-2005, 06:21 AM

[ QUOTE ]
gotcha.!
Just so you know I was just going by the default rules in pokertracker which showed as Loose-Passive/Passive. Obviously they didn't play so passive here, but wouldn't my read up until that point remain the same for the purpose of the thread? I don't know.
not sure if you meant to make note of it for myself, or change it on my original post.

[/ QUOTE ]

You make a mental note of it, so later on in a similar situation against these guys you can play more aggressively.
Don't change it in the original post. You had no idea they were maniacs at the time.