|
View Poll Results: Do you like the DH? | |||
Yes | 20 | 19.80% | |
No | 62 | 61.39% | |
Meh, I could take it or leave it | 19 | 18.81% | |
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OJ: did he do it?
I say no. What say you?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
His not guilty verdict was nothing more than a social response to the not guilty verdict on the rodney king beating trial. I mean he clearly did it, but in the eyes of the biased jury, he didnt deserved to be convicted.
The civil trial got it right, and he was found guilty of negligence that lead to death. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
Dumbest...question...ever. Guilty as sin.
That being said, his "Not Guilty" verdict was correct. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
Blood on the shoes, blood on the socks, blood on the gloves, blood on the knife, blood on the bronco, blood on the khakis, blood on the shirt, blood on the porch....... (5 minutes later) it's totally an accident, it's totally an accident.
I love Bob and Tom. Dead, take two lithium and call me in the morning. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
do what? i voted yes because i think that the average human, given a choice of doing it or not doing, would choose to do it...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
Yes. I believe he turned his ex-wife and her friend into human Pez dispensers.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
YES.
duh. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
Dead, wtf have you done with your avatar???
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
A guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He did it A not guilty verdict means: [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He almost certainly did it just short of reasonable doubt -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He probably did it -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He likely did it more often than not -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He might have done it -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He could very well have done it -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He's innocent -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]We the Jury are too lazy to figure it out -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Jury nullification rules! -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Damn, I'll be a media star if I let Him off -or- [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Insert reason here. His not guilty verdict does not mean he is truly innocent. There are a lot more reasons to get to not guilty than to get to guilty, and most of them still lead you to the likelihood that OJ did it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OJ: did he do it?
[ QUOTE ]
Yes. I believe he turned his ex-wife and her friend into human Pez dispensers. [/ QUOTE ] Is that what ignited the poker boom? |
|
|