Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2005, 03:05 AM
Effin_River1980 Effin_River1980 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 4
Default I know you\'ve felt this

Hi all, as you probably guessed from my previous post, I am a newbie here, but very excited in learning some insightful information. A little about myself: I am relatively new at Hold'em, having clocked in a little more than sixty hours (althought much more online play), and having only played for one year. Yet as a recent college grad, I have taken a students path in undertaking this journey, reading about five books now, plenty of conversation with others.
Currently I am reading John Feeney's "Inside the Poker Mind" (highly recommended), which has caused me to reassess my current strategic thinking.
My current concern involves chasers. Lately I have been consistently been outdrawn when I feel as though I had the best hand. Mike Caro tells us to embrace these chasers, for in the long run they will lose and I will win (a solemn consolation when losing). Then I read a posting by the late Andy Morton on rec.gambling about "schooling" and implicit collusion, and the idea that an increasing number of chasers will actually reduce profit after a certain number (e.g. one person chasing a straight, one a flush, and a third chasing his pair of fours, all the while you hold AK with top pair). His theorem validated what so many of us have felt at low limit ($3/6 for me) poker, and yet I am trying to figure out the best way to combat this kind of table. A relatively passive table, where one can limp in or call on one raise preflop; one where there are usually three to the river or more, with chasers all the way.
It has been suggested that one should reduce the number of unsuited hands, as this will increase stronger draws. Also, someone told me to play more suited connectors in other-than-late positions. This makes sense, but I am still frusterated at my lack of profit (I am a break-even player at the moment) in the face of such bad players. I realize that having played such a small amount of time, other aspects of my game are undeveloped which would increase my hourly earnings, but I am in need of more experienced advice. I hope ya'll can help.
Sorry for the long post

Thanks,
E_R
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2005, 05:10 AM
zephed56 zephed56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Condemned to a lifetime in the kiddie pool, where I will never make moves.
Posts: 761
Default Re: I know you\'ve felt this

Read Small Stakes Hold 'Em.

In really big pots, you want to knock out as many players as you can when you have a vulnerable made hand. Search for the archives for threads created by Ed Miller. Here's an interesting overpair hand.
Big Pot! Big mistake?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2005, 05:18 AM
zephed56 zephed56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Condemned to a lifetime in the kiddie pool, where I will never make moves.
Posts: 761
Default Re: I know you\'ve felt this

Don't go overboard with it though. If there is no way to protect your hand, you should just bet it for value.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.