#1
|
|||
|
|||
50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
these are suppose to be +ev right? or are they -ev, but less -ev than folding?
edit: party 2/4 btw |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
I'm a little surprised.
In 2/4 I play them from UTG in most games - almost entirely for set value. After 20k hands I'm winning with all pairs except 55 (which indicates that the sample size is too small). What is your strategy with them? I would replay a load of hands where you played them past the flop. Your stategy with them appears to not be working. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
I've won money with them. Maybe you should post some questionable hands. I'm positive with them even from EP. You definitely shouldn't be negative with them overall from all positions. I'd look back and post some that you may be unsure about postflop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
i'll play them from up front unless i notice the game is raising a lot and sometimes shorthanded. i'll only play them from MP if i've got 2+ limpers and LP if i've got 3+. postflop i don't try anything tricky, i just play for the sets.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
Important though that you get enough callers into the pot to get the implicit odds high enough. Are you seeing enough callers to the flop?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
[ QUOTE ]
these are suppose to be +ev right? or are they -ev, but less -ev than folding? [/ QUOTE ] LMAO. Seriously, depends how you play them, don't you think? Adam |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
For ages 55 was my worst hand because I was playing it too much too often and not folding it when I did.
Now I tightened up and play 55-22 LP (or with a number of players in) and mosttimes use no-set-no-bet philosophy and my hole is blocked. Ain't making much with them, but at least I'm not losing hand over fist as I used to be. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
There was a post one time by a guy with a huge DB who said they're marginal at best and I'd guess that's right. It probably comes down to what kind of game it is and how well you play. You see guys play them from anywhere in rock gardens, get raised by an overpair and call down. Doesn't make sense.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
if you have enough hands to filter out the times when you were in a blind, try that.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands and i\'ve lost money with 22-55
[ QUOTE ]
Important though that you get enough callers into the pot to get the implicit odds high enough. Are you seeing enough callers to the flop? [/ QUOTE ] Yes and no. I don't mind taking any PP heads up. If I don't get enough callers should I just tell them to call more? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Seriously though, I don't always play them. |
|
|