Did the affiliates ...

FishBurger · #1 03-14-2005, 01:51 AM

... bring this whole mess upon themselves by paying rakeback directly into a player's Party skin account? I think Party would have a tough time proving that an affiliate was paying rakeback to a player if the money had been paid into Neteller or some other account, but having an affiliate deposit money directly into a player's Party account every month is pretty suspicious. It's too bad they were so reckless.

ctv1116 · #2 03-14-2005, 01:55 AM

NOT ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT THIS TOPIC PLEASE!!!!

stinkypete · #3 03-14-2005, 01:55 AM

the fact that they advertise rakeback deals on public websites is a bit of a giveaway...

#4 03-14-2005, 02:00 AM

[ QUOTE ]
... bring this whole mess upon themselves by paying rakeback directly into a player's Party skin account? I think Party would have a tough time proving that an affiliate was paying rakeback to a player if the money had been paid into Neteller or some other account, but having an affiliate deposit money directly into a player's Party account every month is pretty suspicious. It's too bad they were so reckless.

[/ QUOTE ]

The payments were not near as obvious as the hundreds or thousands of trackers with only 1 player on each one. The trackers are what caused the first flags...then the inter-account transfers just helped prove it.

Soleo · #5 03-14-2005, 06:17 AM

Rakeback is not main issue - players leaving Party to sign up at skins is. So to track the problem they may just compare player bases between Party and skins.

GrannyMae · #6 03-14-2005, 03:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Rakeback is not main issue - players leaving Party to sign up at skins is. So to track the problem they may just compare player bases between Party and skins.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is likely the most concise answer/summary i have seen.

Soleo · #7 03-14-2005, 05:24 PM

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I feel proud but please note that I learned that info from your own recent posts.