Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2005, 05:19 PM
Smoove Smoove is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 0
Default thoughts on variance, buying in short, maximizing EV

(this post was written before I played any hands with the new stacks)

I have mixed feelings about Party's move to 100 bb stacks. On the one hand: great! more postflop skills required and less playing like a robot preflop and on the flop. On the other hand: not so great. Given the same buy-in level, 10 PTBB/100 is looking....well...about half as good as it was before. (I doubt a good player will be able to beat these games for 20 PTBB/100 but I'd love for someone to prove me wrong).

Which brings me to my question. I've always been a bit conservative about moving up levels (waited until 30 buyins for NL100). Right now I have about 25 buy-ins for NL200....pre-100 bb stacks I was not planning to make this move until 30-35 buyins but now I'm pondering making it sooner with the thinking that the deeper stacks will allow me to make better postflop decisions, and thus decrease variance. Another thing to consider is the skill difference between levels (is the new NL200 about equal to the old NL100? is the new NL100 worse than the old NL100?)

Could an optimal strategy in this intermediate stage for me be buying in short (say...$120-$150 at a 200 table) ala Matt Flynn?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.