![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that somehow the new software pulls up the entire old thread if there is a response at any future time. So the thread where I assumed someone had usurped my user name was just a reposting of old posts (as I recalled from the specific posts when I actually started reading it).
Hail to confusion! Well, temporary confusion, anyway ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
somehow the new software pulls up the entire old thread if there is a response at any future time. [/ QUOTE ] M -- I don't see any post from '02 except your reply to your old self [img]/forums/images/icons/smirk.gif[/img] What gives? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John,
In the thread Natural Capitalism ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, you're right, John, I misread the date on Ray's post---but that still doesn't explain why this Ed I. thread was sitting at up the top of the OT Forum. I never would have expected a year-old thread to be up with the new stuff and I still don't know why it was there--I didn't pull up any archived material, I just responded hastily to what I believed had to be an impostor (at first glance) in was naturally assumed to be a new thread.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And now the thread seems to have disappeared again. Strange. Well, I guess they may need to iron out a few bugs in the new software. But you get credit for having spotted the weirdest one [img]/forums/images/icons/ooo.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh, I just found the thread. It's the very last thread in "descending date" order. And it looks like Baltimore Ron posted in it today. Yet when you click his name he's 'no longer registered' or whatever the phrase is. Go figure. [img]/forums/images/icons/confused.gif[/img]
|
![]() |
|
|