Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2005, 01:08 AM
chim17 chim17 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 80
Default Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

The main villains in hand are:

Blind - Extreme calling station, very very very passive. Has bet/raised under 5 pots in his hours at the table. These bets were never bluffs.

CO - LAG, he had a disorder which forced him to put chips in the pot with no rhyme or reason. His recent rush has allowed him to continue this activity.

Hero is on the button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Pre-flop: 5 callers, CO raises, Hero reraises, Blind and all 5 callers call. (16 sb)

Flop: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

Checked to CO who bets, Hero raises, Blind and 2 call. (18 bb)

Turn: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Checked to hero who bets, blind, 1, and CO call. (22 bb)

River: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Blind bets, 1 folds, CO raises, Hero...

Comments on all streets leading up to the river appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:12 AM
ThisHo ThisHo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: InternetStreetCorner
Posts: 119
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

[img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]curses the poker gods and mucks his set o' queens. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

There is just no way that none of those villains have an ace (or even a 9). There is just no way you're good here. ESPECIALLY since you have told us that BB is betting becaause he made a hand (isn't that the point of your read comments?).

Oh yeah... and its not out of the question that someone hit a flush on the turn and slow played it a touch.

BadBreak... That's Poker
ThisHo!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:58 AM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

I fold too. Ironically, a Q was the last card you wanted to see on this river. Hi-ho, hi-ho, into the muck they go...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2005, 09:57 AM
chim17 chim17 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 80
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

I folded pretty easily.. I wasn't concerned with the beat.

The rest of the hand look good? Peel one off for free on the turn perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2005, 10:13 AM
chief444 chief444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

[ QUOTE ]
The rest of the hand look good? Peel one off for free on the turn perhaps?

[/ QUOTE ]
Looks good. No way should you check this turn. There's a good chance you have the best hand and you have a big draw on top of that. If anything check the river unimproved but even that may be close.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:11 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

[ QUOTE ]
Looks good. No way should you check this turn. There's a good chance you have the best hand and you have a big draw on top of that. If anything check the river unimproved but even that may be close.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wouldn't this be a situation of check with outs bet with few or no outs?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:15 PM
chief444 chief444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't this be a situation of check with outs bet with few or no outs?

[/ QUOTE ]
No. It's a situation of having a good chance of holding the best hand NOW plus having outs and probably lots of outs. This is a very easy bet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2005, 02:10 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

I see makes sense now. What would be an example of check with outs bet with few or no outs?
Something like A K 4 7 or something like 3 to a flush with you holding no flush cards?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2005, 02:11 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: Monte Carlo 2/4 hand

fizzyizzyold.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2005, 02:27 PM
Derek in NYC Derek in NYC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 130
Default compare this to the wait till turn to raise thread

Hero folds.

But let's look at the flop play, which is more interesting. On a different thread today titled "Wait till turn to raise?" (or something like that), you see an example of a misapplication of Ed Miller's principle.

This hand, by contrast, is an excellent example of a flop where you should consider waiting until the turn to raise. The flop raise does NOT protect your hand, and although you have an edge, you will often lose this hand. Here is why a turn raise is something you should have been considering.

1. The flop raise will not protect your hand. With the flop raise, you lay 19:2 odds, or roughly 9:1 for any caller. It would be correct for any gutshot and middle/bottom pair to call, as well of course, for top pair and flush/str8 draws to call. All your raise on the flop does is handcuff everyone to the pot until the river.

2. Although you have an edge with your overpair, your hand is very vulnerable. Any diamond, king, ace, ten or even queen potentially screws up your edge. Thus, although you could raise for marginal value on the flop, waiting until the turn will give you a much better sense for the value of your hand. If your edge is substantial, you can push it on the turn. If a 4th street scare card falls, you can decide what to do depending on the preceeding action.

3. The likely bettor comes from your right, with a 3-person field to your left. If you smooth call on the flop, there is a reasonable chance that a fourth street blank will result in a bet from the flop bettor. If you raise at this point, you will face the field with 2 big bets, or about 7:1 odds (assuming all the players call the CO's flop bet). At this point, getting only 7:1 odds, you protect your hand against 4 out gutshots, and 5 out bottom/middle pair hands.

As it turned out, the fourth street card was a triple threat card, creating the possibility of an overcard, a straight, and a flush, so raising here is incorrect (unless you have a read that you can bluff people off their hands by representing a flush). Notwithstanding this, you should have been thinking about playing the flop the way I described.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.