|
|
#1
01-18-2005, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
4bb/100 for 20 tables of $.5/1 on 1 monitor: SUCESS!! or luck.....?
linkt to initial post - ]http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1477695&page= &view=&sb=5&o=]
20 tabling is intense I must say  Sorry for the delay in response to my initial challenge, some things have come up lately. But it was definately worth it. My initial impression of it after playing for about 1 minute was that it was not humanly possible, but things started to even out and I got better and faster the more I played. There seemed to almost be waves of hands lol, I remember it being almost relaxing at one point, like I was in a trance and then all of a sudden a load of 8 tables would start blinking and I be extremely stressed for the next 1-2 minutes holding it back. Same thing if I had to answer the phone or something, I would have to spend the next couple minutes catching up. I found that on average I had about 1 table that was timed out, it was usually in the part of task bar where I couldn't see it blinkin easily. I can now somewhat emphasize with the microlimit players who complain about getting drawn out on so much, these players are absurd. On the plus side, I finally got to use some of the more advanced multi-way pot moves, such as concepts from Fekali: http://slicer.headsupclub.com:3455/16/25 . I had always found it ironic how so much thought has been put into these loose/passive games when anyone that good should never be playing in such a weak game! I was in awe at how many free cards I got, I NEVER bet my draws and would get things so cheaply. I have always enjoyed playing suited connectors and I got to do a ton of it and even raise with them, similar to raising k/js on big blind with 5+ in. here is a screen shot of how I set my screen up: http://www.pokermentor.net/images/table_20.jpg and here is one of my poker tracker stats: http://www.pokermentor.net/images/table_20_stats.gif it has 7,000 hands right, I am not sure how many more I am going to play, but I know atleast a couple thousand. I am very happy with the 4.72bb/100 but not sure how much to attribute to luck. It would be interesting to know high my winrate would have went up had I been playing less tables. I really believe that it would not change much and that I would have made almost the exact same moves,making player reads on these guys is just a giant headache no matter how many tables  . My poker tracker says the the MT Ratio is 18.38. I think that that can be accounted for by the 1 table that gets timed often in addition to the "free" hands I am taking at the end when I quit, it gets down to only a few tables.But I have a question for you guys. I have read that it is good to raise low pocket pairs with 5+ players in because it will make the pot bigger and give them move incentive to chase, but do you really think that these noobies are thinking about that kind of thing and that it actually does change their fold to a call? In addition it would be good to have a critique of my pokertracker stats, what could I optimize? Thanks, I will have 1 final post - Mentor 
|
|
#3
01-18-2005, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4bb/100 for 20 tables of $.5/1 on 1 monitor: SUCESS!! or luck..
20 tables....I play 4 tables with duel monitors, one of them 1600x1200 19 in. Hats off for being such a badass
|
|
#8
01-18-2005, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4bb/100 for 20 tables of $.5/1 on 1 monitor: SUCESS!! or luck..
All your numbers look pretty strong to me. fairly tight obviously....but you've got a zillion tables going at once so what can you expect?
V - 15.6, R - 9.5, Ag - 2.7 Good job [ QUOTE ] I NEVER bet my draws and would get things so cheaply. [/ QUOTE ] This part kind of confuses me. In multi-way pots there are many situations where betting your draw has value and you want to not let the OTHER players see the next card cheaply when you are the one drawing to a big hand.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
