Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

[toughdude]

[lorinda]

22% of something is more than 100% of nothing.

Lori

[GrannyMae]

syntax??

you back?

[toughdude]

[westmt01]

I'd say the over/under on this joker getting banned and all of his posts deleted is 4:00 EST. Any bets? Sorry, but I DO charge a rake.

[serling]

I also deposited $100 there in July. They charged me an additional $4.06 NETeller fee.

I lost the $100 in a hyperaggressive 2/4 game, which was the only game going at the time.

But I did save $2 in rake on the hand that I won.

serling

[thwang99]

It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if the site GIVES rake back, even. We (poker players) play where the fish are. Party can raise the rake to a $5 cap, and yet we'll still play there. They can raise the rake to 15% and we'd still play there.

It's profitable. Complain all you want but our rake back choices lie with the Party skins.

- Tony

[pudley4]

[ QUOTE ]
hey also ,
since playing there i only put a 100 on the site. I am up 400 and have saved 1032 in rakes, go figure.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're up a whole $400? Wow. And is that after this (from several earlier posts)...

[ QUOTE ]
Hey i won about 500 last night

[/ QUOTE ]

So this means you were a losing player until last night?

And that's even after you saved over $1000 in rakes?

So that means you're a horribly losing player who is only winning because of the small rake at Zero Rake and therefore couldn't beat a regular online game?


OMG YOU CAN'T EVEN BEAT PLAYERS AT PARTYPOKER!!!!.

You, sir, must be the best player ever.

(How about I just give you $5 and you go away and never come back.)

[toughdude]

[lorinda]

There are 18831 other users apart from you on this site, and not one of them agrees with you.

Does this explain why the games are dead?

Lori